2019
DOI: 10.1002/asjc.2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impulsive semilinear heat equation with delay in control and in state

Abstract: In this paper, we prove the interior approximate controllability of the impulsive semilinear heat equation with delay in control and in state by proving first that the linear heat equation with delay in control is approximately controllable.After that, we add impulses and a nonlinear perturbation with delay in state, and using Rothe's fixed point theorem, we prove that the interior approximate controllability of the impulsive semilinear system. Finally, we present some open problems and a possible general fram… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a limited amount of work is also available on approximate controllability. Camacho and Leiva 30 proved the approximate controllability for semilinear impulsive heat equation: {arrayζ()=Aζ()+Bωv˜(γ1)+fe(,ζ(γ),v˜()),[0,r˜],k,arrayζ()=ϕ(),[γ,0],arrayv˜()=v˜0(),[γ1,0],arrayζ(k+)=ζ(k)+ke(k,ζ(k),v˜(k)),k=1,2,3,,p, where truev˜frakturCfalse(false[0,truer˜false];frakturℜmfalse),0.1emϕfrakturC,0.1em<...>…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a limited amount of work is also available on approximate controllability. Camacho and Leiva 30 proved the approximate controllability for semilinear impulsive heat equation: {arrayζ()=Aζ()+Bωv˜(γ1)+fe(,ζ(γ),v˜()),[0,r˜],k,arrayζ()=ϕ(),[γ,0],arrayv˜()=v˜0(),[γ1,0],arrayζ(k+)=ζ(k)+ke(k,ζ(k),v˜(k)),k=1,2,3,,p, where truev˜frakturCfalse(false[0,truer˜false];frakturℜmfalse),0.1emϕfrakturC,0.1em<...>…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical PID-type control techniques do not provide acceptable results when working with processes that present elevated delay [5] or inverse response processes [4]. It is well known that PID controllers are by far the most applied form of feedback in use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the PID controllers' accomplishment is bounded in complex systems [2], [3]. One of the most critical process control problems is time delays [7]. It could cause some low-performance errors, non-convenient controller complexity, and systems instability, also if the systems contain varying time delays, produced as mixing consequences, wireless data communication protocols, or measurement lines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could cause some low-performance errors, non-convenient controller complexity, and systems instability, also if the systems contain varying time delays, produced as mixing consequences, wireless data communication protocols, or measurement lines. Sometimes, it could lead to poor stability and performance, and classical control cannot control the process [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%