2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2011.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impulsivity and household indebtedness: Evidence from real life

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
72
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
72
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…From the perspective of impulsivity, the BIS score was also found to be a statistically significant predictor as a standalone variable. This finding supports the view that level of impulsiveness plays a role in financial decision making (Ottaviani & Vandone, 2011). However self-control linked to both time orientation and impulsivity were not statistically significant predictors of preservation in the combined model.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…From the perspective of impulsivity, the BIS score was also found to be a statistically significant predictor as a standalone variable. This finding supports the view that level of impulsiveness plays a role in financial decision making (Ottaviani & Vandone, 2011). However self-control linked to both time orientation and impulsivity were not statistically significant predictors of preservation in the combined model.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Individuals high in impulsivity are likewise nonplanful, which makes them more likely to procrastinate (Youzhi & Jing, 2009), to incur high levels of unsecured (e.g., consumer) debt (Ottaviani & Vandone, 2011), and to have difficulties in school, work, health, and social adjustment (see Whiteside & Lynam, 2001). Their behavior and thought patterns also set them up for social and cognitive consequences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the significance of Impulsive spending, in the same work it has been linked to Impulsive Personality that led to income shocks. In [17] Impulsivity was found a strong predictor of Unsecured Debt but not Secured Debt, like mortgages and car loans. The rationale behind this, stems from the fact that Secured Debt affects decisions that last for a long time and therefore is linked to Life-Cycle theory [20], according to which consumer enter into debt on rational grounds in order to maximise utility and thus is not associated with Impulsive behaviour which The problem of all this work summarised above is that it is characterised by a weak statistical modelling with the proportion of variance being explained in most of the models being around 10%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In Economics, modelling Consumer Indebtedness traditionally adopted the "rational" behaviour of debtors [17], limiting the research on socio-economic variables. But recent interdisciplinary studies show that the behaviour of consumers deviates from the "rational" model [17] and that level of debt prediction is not a function of economic factors exclusively [20], [13], [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%