2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impulsivity is associated with behavioral decision-making deficits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
174
3
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 241 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
13
174
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Increased disadvantageous risk taking in the Iowa Gambling Task has been regularly associated to enhanced impulsivity, especially in terms of UPPS-P Lack of Premeditation (Zermatten et al, 2005;Franken et al, 2008) and the BIS-11 Nonplanning and Motor Impulsiveness scales (Snowden and Gray, 2011). However, according to Sharma et al, (2013) the inter-correlations between behaviourally assessed motor impulsivity and self-reported impulsivity levels are relatively low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased disadvantageous risk taking in the Iowa Gambling Task has been regularly associated to enhanced impulsivity, especially in terms of UPPS-P Lack of Premeditation (Zermatten et al, 2005;Franken et al, 2008) and the BIS-11 Nonplanning and Motor Impulsiveness scales (Snowden and Gray, 2011). However, according to Sharma et al, (2013) the inter-correlations between behaviourally assessed motor impulsivity and self-reported impulsivity levels are relatively low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent reports showed the complexity of this task that might also be considered as a measure of risk taking [1,[8][9][10][11]. In particular, poor performance during the first part of the task has been related to ambiguous risk taking [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Cognitive Impulsivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with damage to the amygdala or ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC), which encompasses the OFC, are impaired on the IGT-choosing more cards from decks associated with larger rewards, yet disproportionately greater long-term losses (Bechara et al, 1999). Based on these original reports, IGT impairments in psychiatric populations are often interpreted as a direct indication of OFC dysfunction without any further proof aside from the behavioral impairment (Franken et al, 2008;Starcke et al, 2010). However, the role of the OFC in regulating this type of decision making has recently been challenged (Fellows and Farah, 2005;Fellows, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%