2003
DOI: 10.1080/00150190390211639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impurities in Perovskites: Evidence from ESR of Posistor Barium Titanate Ceramics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors whose examinations included EPR spectra at room temperature and above, attributed a peak at g = 1.97 to the localized Ti 3+ states [16]. Others emphasized that this and similar values of the g-factor (g = 1.963-1.975) should be ascribed to the Ti 3+ -V O , that is Ti 3+ -F + centers, rather than exactly to Ti 3+ [21][22][23][24]. These observations of Ti 3+ and Ti 3+ -V O signals at room temperature and above strongly contradict the reports of a different group of authors, where manifestation of the Ti 3+ ion in EPR spectra was observed only at rather low temperatures (below 250 K [17], even mostly below 80 K [18][19][20]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some authors whose examinations included EPR spectra at room temperature and above, attributed a peak at g = 1.97 to the localized Ti 3+ states [16]. Others emphasized that this and similar values of the g-factor (g = 1.963-1.975) should be ascribed to the Ti 3+ -V O , that is Ti 3+ -F + centers, rather than exactly to Ti 3+ [21][22][23][24]. These observations of Ti 3+ and Ti 3+ -V O signals at room temperature and above strongly contradict the reports of a different group of authors, where manifestation of the Ti 3+ ion in EPR spectra was observed only at rather low temperatures (below 250 K [17], even mostly below 80 K [18][19][20]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Dunbar et al [29] and Castro et al [30] considered just the doped ceramic. On the other hand, several authors reported that the EPR peak with g ≈ 1.97 may be caused by intrinsic Ti 3+ related defects in BaTiO 3 [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] . A few of them observed this peak just in reduced BaTiO 3 ceramic [20,25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%