“…While some of the very first mitogenetic population studies already included individuals of Mexican descent [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ], it has been repeatedly claimed since that country-wide mtDNA data from the general population was underrepresented in databases [ 13 , 18 , 20 , 30 , 31 , 32 ], together with Indigenous American genetic data in general [ 33 , 34 ]. Previous studies were either based on a small number of subjects (e.g., [ 35 , 36 ]), mtDNA segments shorter than the 1.1 kbp gold-standard control region (CR) range [ 37 ] (D-loop, nps 16024–16569 1–576; e.g., [ 16 , 18 ]), ancient DNA [ 38 , 39 ], data from geographically restricted or Indigenous population groups (e.g., [ 10 , 40 ]) where lineage representation could be heavily biased [ 41 ], US Mexicans (e.g., [ 20 , 21 ]), did not report the actual haplotypes (e.g., [ 4 , 42 ]), or a combination of these factors. The lack of general Mexico-wide mtDNA data affects both phylo- and population genetic studies aiming to reconstruct the history of human settlement and their interaction [ 20 ], as well as the forensic application of mtDNA as a vital niche marker in human identification and the assessment of biogeographic origin [ 37 ].…”