2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2017.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

iMRI During Transsphenoidal Surgery

Abstract: Surgeons routinely use adjunct imaging tools during transsphenoidal surgery (TSS). Intra-operative MRI (iMRI) was quickly adopted as a surgical adjunct for TSS. Currently, a variety of iMRI systems are in use during TSS. The variations in iMRI systems include field strengths (0.15 to 3 T), magnet configurations (open, retractable, double doughnut etc.) and room configurations. Most studies report that the primary utility of iMRI during TSS lies in detecting resectable tumor residuals following maximal resectio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A systematic review observed that complete radiological resection in patients whose procedure involved intraoperative ultrasound was 67.1% (range 63.5-77.8%) and endocrine remission was 88.4% (range 76-100%) [24]. Studies with ioMRI also evidences the benefits with intraoperative unexpected residuals in up to 42% (range 15-83%) of cases, of which re-exploration was attempted in 36% (range 9-83%) and further tumor resection occurred in 33% (range 9-83%) of the cases [25]. But this paper considered low-and high-field ioMRI.…”
Section: Magnet Resonance Imaging (Mri)mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A systematic review observed that complete radiological resection in patients whose procedure involved intraoperative ultrasound was 67.1% (range 63.5-77.8%) and endocrine remission was 88.4% (range 76-100%) [24]. Studies with ioMRI also evidences the benefits with intraoperative unexpected residuals in up to 42% (range 15-83%) of cases, of which re-exploration was attempted in 36% (range 9-83%) and further tumor resection occurred in 33% (range 9-83%) of the cases [25]. But this paper considered low-and high-field ioMRI.…”
Section: Magnet Resonance Imaging (Mri)mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Intraoperative image interpretation is even more difficult in transsphenoidal pituitary surgery than in glioma surgery, for example. This evaluation should only be done by an experienced neuroradiologist, because the literature shows relevant cases of false-positive leading to resection of normal tissue, in both ioMRI and ioUS [24,25]. The Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) suggested in 2016 that intraoperative images in nonfunctioning adenomas may help to improve overall gross total resection but at the cost of removing normal tissue [26].…”
Section: Magnet Resonance Imaging (Mri)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inside the 5 G line, the surgical equipment has to be nonferromagnetic for MRI compatibility. Alternatively, larger ORs have been designed housing the magnetic resonance scanner and a surgical zone outside the 5 G line, for optimal use of standard surgical tools …”
Section: New Intraoperative Imaging Technologies Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A moveable operating table then allows to perform surgery with conventional instruments, while the patient can quickly be moved toward the scanner for intraoperative imaging. Twin ORs with a shared MRI improve the device efficiency …”
Section: New Intraoperative Imaging Technologies Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether it helps to lateralise an otherwise undetectable adenoma is questionable, due to the often central location of the lesion and venous asymmetry 1 . Several other imaging modalities have been tried in an attempt to improve remission rates 3;4;5 . However, the sizes and the certainties of their effects on surgical remission rates for Cushing’s disease remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%