2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-beam fatigue behavior of F82H steel at 500 °C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of cycles to crack initiation was defined either as a number of cycles when a crack or a slip greater than the grain size was observed using a microscope after an interrupted test and polishing the surface 177 or by combining initiation and growth up to 100 microns due to SEM resolution, then subtracting the number of visible striations in the specimen from the number of cycles to failure. 128…”
Section: Crack Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of cycles to crack initiation was defined either as a number of cycles when a crack or a slip greater than the grain size was observed using a microscope after an interrupted test and polishing the surface 177 or by combining initiation and growth up to 100 microns due to SEM resolution, then subtracting the number of visible striations in the specimen from the number of cycles to failure. 128…”
Section: Crack Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…133 Irradiation was discovered to retard crack propagation similarly to how it retarded crack initiation. 128 Kovarik developed a method for measuring the crack propagation rate using mini cantilever specimens and a resonance fatigue test method with micrometric resolution, measuring the crack propagation using a compliance technique. 141 Crack growth rates comparable to rates in standard tests can be achieved.…”
Section: Crack Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several types of small fatigue specimens such as a round-bar, hourglass, and flat-plate were used in previous studies [3][4][5][6][7] to evaluate the fatigue life. However, these specimens did not always show the same fatigue life as the recommended standard specimen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though small fatigue specimens with several shapes such as round bar, hourglass, and flat plate were used in previous studies, [3][4][5][6][7][8] verification was insufficient to determine whether these small specimens showed the same fatigue life as the standard specimen, which was the round-bar specimen with a minimum diameter of a few millimeters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%