2022
DOI: 10.1111/japp.12583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Cash We Trust?

Abstract: Many individuals have miserable work lives, in which they must toil away at mind-numbing yet exhausting tasks for hours on end, being ordered about by their superiors, perhaps with few guarantees that this source of income will persist for very long. However, this is only half of the story: what is centrally important is that many of those who endure these conditions are denied a fair wage in return for the burdens that they bear. In this article, I reflect on the significance of this fact in order to argue fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…47 They are typically also the most highly paid jobs, and often sources of high status. 48 Meanwhile, the lowest-paying jobs also score low on accounts of the goods of work, and are often performed by workers with little or no bargaining power. A second strand in the philosophy of work thus asks how to achieve a fair distribution of the valuable parts of good jobs.…”
Section: Distributive Justice and Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47 They are typically also the most highly paid jobs, and often sources of high status. 48 Meanwhile, the lowest-paying jobs also score low on accounts of the goods of work, and are often performed by workers with little or no bargaining power. A second strand in the philosophy of work thus asks how to achieve a fair distribution of the valuable parts of good jobs.…”
Section: Distributive Justice and Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little work evaluates the different means of creating a volunteer military. 3 However, the trend does seem to be shifting (see, e.g.,Gheaus and Herzog 2016;Kandiyali 2023;Parr 2022;Schouten 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%