2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2022.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-cell NMR: Why and how?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
107
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 1,995 publications
(3,276 reference statements)
5
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are quite appealing systems for in-cell NMR studies: (i) only ∼170 of them are necessary to fill a 5 mm NMR tube; (ii) they can be manipulated and microinjected cell by cell in about 1 h; (iii) they do not require a specific wet-lab, even though a source of oocytes has to be found (commercial companies sell them at ∼$1–2 a piece); (iv) they can stand the injection of about 20–50 nL of high-concentration material, which generates ∼20–50-fold intracellular dilutions; (v) they can survive and maintain their integrity about 18 h in the NMR tube without any medium replenishment; and (vi) they are well-known model systems in biology . This strategy has been used for in-cell NMR investigations of both proteins ,,,,, and nucleic acids. We encourage the reader to refer to the published, detailed protocols. ,, We will not present them extensively once again, but we must give a few words of caution: (i) Because of the cylindrical shape of NMR tubes, hundreds of oocytes must be stacked on each other and thus require high-density outer solvent (e.g., a buffer containing 20% w/w Ficoll) to not crush within a few hours; (ii) their cell-cycle stage is well-defined, which comes with certain advantages when studying cell-signaling and post-translational modifications, , but it leaves little room for modifications of the cellular conditions; (iii) their high-lipid yolk compartment is problematic for molecules that would preferentially bind to lipids; (iv) they generate important peak broadening due to sample inhomogeneities (settled oocytes leave large intercellular spaces, and the intracellular compartments are also diverse enough to present distinct magnetic susceptibilities); , and (v) their cellular organization is clearly not that of more standard prokaryotic or eukaryotic cells. Oocyte cytosolic extracts represent a good proxy in many regards, e.g., to test the cellular stability, the NMR detectability or even to investigate post-translational modifications (PTMs). ,, Extracts are also easier to handle and allow a better control of concentrations, of the time origin for time-resolved NMR monitoring, and better NMR resolution. ,,,, Hence, while they enabled many seminal contributions in the field, oocytes tend to lose their attractivity in the very last years.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These are quite appealing systems for in-cell NMR studies: (i) only ∼170 of them are necessary to fill a 5 mm NMR tube; (ii) they can be manipulated and microinjected cell by cell in about 1 h; (iii) they do not require a specific wet-lab, even though a source of oocytes has to be found (commercial companies sell them at ∼$1–2 a piece); (iv) they can stand the injection of about 20–50 nL of high-concentration material, which generates ∼20–50-fold intracellular dilutions; (v) they can survive and maintain their integrity about 18 h in the NMR tube without any medium replenishment; and (vi) they are well-known model systems in biology . This strategy has been used for in-cell NMR investigations of both proteins ,,,,, and nucleic acids. We encourage the reader to refer to the published, detailed protocols. ,, We will not present them extensively once again, but we must give a few words of caution: (i) Because of the cylindrical shape of NMR tubes, hundreds of oocytes must be stacked on each other and thus require high-density outer solvent (e.g., a buffer containing 20% w/w Ficoll) to not crush within a few hours; (ii) their cell-cycle stage is well-defined, which comes with certain advantages when studying cell-signaling and post-translational modifications, , but it leaves little room for modifications of the cellular conditions; (iii) their high-lipid yolk compartment is problematic for molecules that would preferentially bind to lipids; (iv) they generate important peak broadening due to sample inhomogeneities (settled oocytes leave large intercellular spaces, and the intracellular compartments are also diverse enough to present distinct magnetic susceptibilities); , and (v) their cellular organization is clearly not that of more standard prokaryotic or eukaryotic cells. Oocyte cytosolic extracts represent a good proxy in many regards, e.g., to test the cellular stability, the NMR detectability or even to investigate post-translational modifications (PTMs). ,, Extracts are also easier to handle and allow a better control of concentrations, of the time origin for time-resolved NMR monitoring, and better NMR resolution. ,,,, Hence, while they enabled many seminal contributions in the field, oocytes tend to lose their attractivity in the very last years.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of them were actually proposed before the year 2000, in times where large diameter NMR probes were used to monitor organs and cells metabolism. We refer the reader to our detailed inventory spanning this wider range of in-cell NMR studies . Sadly enough, these flow-probe systems were developed in-house and were not transferred from lab to lab.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations