2005 Annual Conference Proceedings
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--15022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Common Methodology For Objective And Outcome Based Programs Assessment

Abstract: This paper reviews the development of continuous quality improvement plans for three closely aligned engineering technology programs at Central Connecticut State University (CCSU). Many of the goals for the three programs are similar thus allowing for the development of common learning objectives and learning outcomes which may be assessed simultaneously. The learning objectives and learning outcomes, while based upon the specific program mission, allow data collection, metrics for assessment and evaluation to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Engineering Technology Department has presented an "Incommon Methodology for Objective-and Outcome-based Programs Assessment". 3 Through it Central has streamlined its process by assessing common learning objectives and outcomes across three TAC of ABET TC2K accredited programs simultaneously leaving only a limited number of additional discipline specific program assessments. The methodology detailed and formalized is built upon the foundations established by predecessors.…”
Section: Assessment Methods and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Engineering Technology Department has presented an "Incommon Methodology for Objective-and Outcome-based Programs Assessment". 3 Through it Central has streamlined its process by assessing common learning objectives and outcomes across three TAC of ABET TC2K accredited programs simultaneously leaving only a limited number of additional discipline specific program assessments. The methodology detailed and formalized is built upon the foundations established by predecessors.…”
Section: Assessment Methods and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,20 1. 21,22 Charted data of measured assessments from fall 2008 and spring 2009 are shown as Figure 2. Currently, within our continuous improvement plan, any attainment level rating less than 2 is cause for concern, and if prolonged must be remedied.…”
Section: Design Of Experiments (Doe) Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%