SAE Technical Paper Series 2013
DOI: 10.4271/2013-01-1085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-Cylinder Flow Analysis in a Two-Stroke Engine - A Comparison of Different Turbulence Models Using CFD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the numerical simulation of the engine, the RNG k – ε two‐equation model coupled with the detailed chemical reaction kinetic mechanism can effectively predict the turbulent flow field changes in the cylinder. Krishna et al 31 used STAR‐CD software to explore the in‐cylinder flow field using different turbulence models on a single‐cylinder two‐stroke engine and compared it with the in‐cylinder velocity field measured by a particle image velocimetry. The results confirm that the RNG k – ε two‐equation model is closer to the experimental measurement results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the numerical simulation of the engine, the RNG k – ε two‐equation model coupled with the detailed chemical reaction kinetic mechanism can effectively predict the turbulent flow field changes in the cylinder. Krishna et al 31 used STAR‐CD software to explore the in‐cylinder flow field using different turbulence models on a single‐cylinder two‐stroke engine and compared it with the in‐cylinder velocity field measured by a particle image velocimetry. The results confirm that the RNG k – ε two‐equation model is closer to the experimental measurement results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases a characteristic feature of the flow field may provide the most appropriate metric for comparison of velocity fields from PIV, large eddy simulations (LES) or Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) modelling. The speed of the flow along the central axis of the intake port (Pera and Angelberger 2011), or the axis of the intake jet (Ameen et al 2017) can be suitable choices, as can the location of vortex centres (Imberdis et al 2007;Yang et al 2014) or spatially averaged tumble ratio (Krishna et al 2013;Koch et al 2014). As well as mean velocities, for LES simulations with many realisations, RMS velocities along selected vertical and horizontal planes have been used to compare the effect of mesh refinement on the simulation of an optical engine (Baumann et al 2014).…”
Section: Methods For Comparing Vector Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the flow field analysis, conservation equations of mass, momentum and energy are solved. Here, RNG k-ε turbulence model is used [4]. PISO (pressure implicit with splitting of operators) algorithm is used for solving algebraic finite volume equations.…”
Section: Geometrical and Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%