2002
DOI: 10.1108/14717794200200025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In defence of care: The importance of care as a positive concept

Abstract: This article is about the implications of the different uses of the concept of care in the research and debate on home care. It can be read as a comment on the British debate, seen with Norwegian eyes, and from a starting point where care is a positively loaded concept. The article begins with a definition of care, in order to try to identify some core elements, and then proceeds to examine two main lines of attack on care in the British debate. A distinction between care as an ideal and as practice is introdu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several authors contend that the relative failure of modern day health care to address the needs of people with chronic illness has arisen, in no small measure, from the promotion of an individualistic view of the world in which independence has become ‘lionized’ (Kivnick & Murray, 1997) and interdependence and communitarian values neglected (Clark, 1995; Evans, 1999; Mintz & Marosy, 2000). However, if personhood is best understood in the context of relationships (see above), it is important to recognize that the best relationships are reciprocal (MacDonald, 2002; Rønning, 2002). Such relationships are created and sustained in situations where all parties appreciate the need to achieve an appropriate balance between independence, dependence and interdependence (Rønning, 2002), and therefore valuing interdependence becomes a central concern (Clark, 2002).…”
Section: Valuing Interdependencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several authors contend that the relative failure of modern day health care to address the needs of people with chronic illness has arisen, in no small measure, from the promotion of an individualistic view of the world in which independence has become ‘lionized’ (Kivnick & Murray, 1997) and interdependence and communitarian values neglected (Clark, 1995; Evans, 1999; Mintz & Marosy, 2000). However, if personhood is best understood in the context of relationships (see above), it is important to recognize that the best relationships are reciprocal (MacDonald, 2002; Rønning, 2002). Such relationships are created and sustained in situations where all parties appreciate the need to achieve an appropriate balance between independence, dependence and interdependence (Rønning, 2002), and therefore valuing interdependence becomes a central concern (Clark, 2002).…”
Section: Valuing Interdependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if personhood is best understood in the context of relationships (see above), it is important to recognize that the best relationships are reciprocal (MacDonald, 2002; Rønning, 2002). Such relationships are created and sustained in situations where all parties appreciate the need to achieve an appropriate balance between independence, dependence and interdependence (Rønning, 2002), and therefore valuing interdependence becomes a central concern (Clark, 2002). Such considerations apply equally to nurse–patient relationships, which constitute the ‘essence’ of new nursing (McCormack, 2001, 2004).…”
Section: Valuing Interdependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reciprocity can be defined as "the equality of perceived investments in and outcomes from a relationship relative to the persons' own internal standards" (Prichard, 1969: p. 180, referenced in Thomas & Rose, 2010. In fact, reciprocity is not only a necessity from the users' perspective, but also a prerequisite for care workers to feel satisfaction with their daily work (Thomas & Rose, 2010;Rönning, 2002). Rönning (2002) explains that definitions of the term care vary, in general along a scale in which one extreme is being vulnerable to those in power and dependent on the paternalistic whims of others.…”
Section: Aim and Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, reciprocity is not only a necessity from the users' perspective, but also a prerequisite for care workers to feel satisfaction with their daily work (Thomas & Rose, 2010;Rönning, 2002). Rönning (2002) explains that definitions of the term care vary, in general along a scale in which one extreme is being vulnerable to those in power and dependent on the paternalistic whims of others. This is particularly interesting considering that the caring sciences are female dominated.…”
Section: Aim and Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation