2014
DOI: 10.1093/sp/jxu024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Defence of Gender Equality? Comparing the Political Debates about Headscarves and Honor-Related Crimes in France and the Netherlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Netherlands, the field of formal regulation has been very dispersed. Rather than a focus on efforts to create new laws (though those did exist), the headscarf was largely regulated through bottom-up conflict in multiple domains of school, university, leisure, sport, and government (Roggeband and Lettinga, 2016). Advisory rulings of the precursor to the Dutch Commission for Human Rights often protected the right of women to cover themselves but pressures to limit that right continue to be exerted throughout all domains of social life.…”
Section: Regulating the Headscarf: Postcolonial Difference And Decolonizing Possibilities In The Early 2000smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Netherlands, the field of formal regulation has been very dispersed. Rather than a focus on efforts to create new laws (though those did exist), the headscarf was largely regulated through bottom-up conflict in multiple domains of school, university, leisure, sport, and government (Roggeband and Lettinga, 2016). Advisory rulings of the precursor to the Dutch Commission for Human Rights often protected the right of women to cover themselves but pressures to limit that right continue to be exerted throughout all domains of social life.…”
Section: Regulating the Headscarf: Postcolonial Difference And Decolonizing Possibilities In The Early 2000smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, the emerging cultural bias implies a qualitative change of the differences established between ‘us’ and ‘them’. As a marker of cultural difference gender contributes to a hierarchical and moral juxtaposition of qualities and characteristics perceived as genuinely Swiss with features considered as culturally different and inferior (see also Dietze, 2009; Roggeband and Lettinga, 2014).…”
Section: Exploring Turning Points In Swiss Immigration Politics From mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current research remains unclear about how gender has shaped migration policies before becoming a signpost of cultural difference and before normative framings of gender equality became widespread during the past decade. Most contributions are based on the analysis of distinct incidents and historical moments, often focusing on the culturalisation of Muslim women and men (Korteweg and Yurdakul, 2009; Roggeband and Lettinga, 2014). Little effort has been made to trace historical trajectories that have led to shifting boundaries, and to illuminate changing roles of gender as a boundary marker (exceptions are Schrover and Moloney, 2013; Roggeband and Verloo, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout Europe, refugees' gender-role values have become the subject of heated public debates over the last years, especially after reported sexual assaults at the 2015/16 New Year's Eve festivities in Cologne (Triandafyllidou 2018). In this debate, the argument that refugees' more traditional gender-role values are a barrier to their social integration, a view traditionally held by the populist right (Korteweg and Yurdakul 2014), is increasingly found in mainstream public debates in Europe as well (Roggeband and Lettinga 2016;Lenneis and Agergaard 2018;Bonjour and Duyvendak 2018). We consider refugee women to be a particularly interesting case because many come from countries with traditional gender-role values where men are household heads (Kelly and Breslin 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%