1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0720(199906)13:3<283::aid-acp642>3.0.co;2-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In defence of keyword experiments: a reply to Gruneberg's commentary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This latter delay was introduced both because of questions over the long-term effectiveness of the keyword method (e.g. Wang & Thomas, 1999;Wang et al, 1992) and because it is equally important that the success of retrieval practice should be evaluated over a longer term than an immediate test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This latter delay was introduced both because of questions over the long-term effectiveness of the keyword method (e.g. Wang & Thomas, 1999;Wang et al, 1992) and because it is equally important that the success of retrieval practice should be evaluated over a longer term than an immediate test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another constraint of the keyword method is that it is not effective to teach cognates (simpler word or picture association is better) and abstract words (Ellis, 1995). Further, this technique makes retrieval of words slower than rote memorization because recall takes place through the keyword (Van Hell & Candia Mahn, 1997;Wang & Thomas, 1999). The fourth limitation of the keyword method concerns its inefficiency for productive recalls: 2 the keyword method is beneficial for receptive tests; rote memorization is beneficial for productive tests (de Groot, Dannenburg, & Van Hell, 1994).…”
Section: Rote Memorization and Mnemonic Elaboration Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the debate between Gruneberg (1998) and Wang and Thomas (1999) about the efficacy of the mnemonic keyword method for enhancing long-term recall, a number of questions remained unresolved. Wang and Thomas state that the keyword method is not effective for enhancing long-term recall because the original keyword encoding is fragile, and alternative representations may be evoked, particularly after a delay.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%