2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.02.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-Depth Analysis of Anti-HLA Antibodies Using C1q Assay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…34 A 2022 meta-analysis of 26 studies estimated that patients with C1q + DSA had a 2.4 times increased risk of graft failure (95% CI 1.66-3.47, p < .00001) and a 3.13 times increased risk of death (95% CI 1.06-9.23, p = .04) compared to those with C1q-DSA. 35 While C1q testing is available for clinical practice, its overall utility remains controversial due to the strong association between C1q binding activity and MFI 36 or antibody titer, 37 and studies suggesting that C1q binding activity measurements can be affected by diluting or concentrating the serum samples. 38 DSA detection is critical to diagnosis of ABMR but its use as a screening test has certain limitations.…”
Section: Donor-s Pecific Antibodie Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 A 2022 meta-analysis of 26 studies estimated that patients with C1q + DSA had a 2.4 times increased risk of graft failure (95% CI 1.66-3.47, p < .00001) and a 3.13 times increased risk of death (95% CI 1.06-9.23, p = .04) compared to those with C1q-DSA. 35 While C1q testing is available for clinical practice, its overall utility remains controversial due to the strong association between C1q binding activity and MFI 36 or antibody titer, 37 and studies suggesting that C1q binding activity measurements can be affected by diluting or concentrating the serum samples. 38 DSA detection is critical to diagnosis of ABMR but its use as a screening test has certain limitations.…”
Section: Donor-s Pecific Antibodie Smentioning
confidence: 99%