2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0038-1098(99)00511-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-depth characterisation of electrical carrier activation in Zn+-implanted and laser annealed InP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electrical properties of the treated InP samples depend on the N 2 pressure in the annealing chamber and, coherently with previous experiments in air, on the laser single pulse power density [3,5]. Moreover, a correlation between the implanted Zn distribution and the surface carrier densities was evidenced by means of in-depth electrical measurements and SIMS (secondary ion mass spectroscopy) [7], thus supporting the idea of Zn activation driven by LPPLA in nitrogen atmosphere. However, the measurement of the carrier activation energy has not been attempted yet and no conclusive proof on Zn activation has been given so far.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The electrical properties of the treated InP samples depend on the N 2 pressure in the annealing chamber and, coherently with previous experiments in air, on the laser single pulse power density [3,5]. Moreover, a correlation between the implanted Zn distribution and the surface carrier densities was evidenced by means of in-depth electrical measurements and SIMS (secondary ion mass spectroscopy) [7], thus supporting the idea of Zn activation driven by LPPLA in nitrogen atmosphere. However, the measurement of the carrier activation energy has not been attempted yet and no conclusive proof on Zn activation has been given so far.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…where α f and α s are the absorption coefficients of the film and the substrate respectively, L is the sample thickness (L 400 µm) and l is the film thickness (l 110-130 nm) [7].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%