2021
DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2021.1959125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In field settings group members (often) show effort gains instead of social loafing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Motivational gains were consistently observed in conditions of high indispensability, whether it is a conjunctive task, where the weakest member determines the team performance; a disjunctive task [ 41 ], where the strongest member determines the team performance, or where competing later or last during sequential teamwork (e.g., the last runner in a relay race) determines the team performance [ 27 , 42 , 43 ]. Since the NBA’s regular season consists of 82 games in 25 weeks, it is more reasonable to explain motivation gains with the Cost Component rather than the Expectancy Component, which assumes a disjunctive task condition where every game is won or lost by a high performer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Motivational gains were consistently observed in conditions of high indispensability, whether it is a conjunctive task, where the weakest member determines the team performance; a disjunctive task [ 41 ], where the strongest member determines the team performance, or where competing later or last during sequential teamwork (e.g., the last runner in a relay race) determines the team performance [ 27 , 42 , 43 ]. Since the NBA’s regular season consists of 82 games in 25 weeks, it is more reasonable to explain motivation gains with the Cost Component rather than the Expectancy Component, which assumes a disjunctive task condition where every game is won or lost by a high performer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hüffmeier et al [ 42 ] noted that a feeling of belonging and cohesion developed in sport field conditions, where members know each other well and have worked together for a long time, where it is more likely to trigger motivation gains in a field study than in a laboratory condition. Since various psychological factors, such as leadership, as well as the relationship and cohesion among members, can affect motivation, this study divided the performance level of members by individual annual salary rather than statistics (e.g., EFF, PTS).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%