2017
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2017.2754464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-Flight Calibration of Gyros and Star Sensor With Observability Analysis for SINS/CNS Integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some literatures show that the accuracy of error coefficient calibration is related to the system observability. 17,20 Better observability will significantly improve the calibration accuracies of error coefficients. At present, there are four main methods to analyze the system observability: the piece-wise constant system (PWCS), 21 the singular value decomposition (SVD) 22 to analyze the observability matrix, the fisher information matrix (FIM), [23][24][25] and the Lie algebra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some literatures show that the accuracy of error coefficient calibration is related to the system observability. 17,20 Better observability will significantly improve the calibration accuracies of error coefficients. At present, there are four main methods to analyze the system observability: the piece-wise constant system (PWCS), 21 the singular value decomposition (SVD) 22 to analyze the observability matrix, the fisher information matrix (FIM), [23][24][25] and the Lie algebra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,27 For the first two methods, it is difficult to analyze the observability of a single error coefficient. 20 For the latter method, if the dimension of the dynamical system is high, it will significantly increase the computational complexity. 28 Therefore, the FIM is exploited to determine the optimal observation sequence in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the GNSS relies on signals from artificial satellites, and therefore lacks autonomy and is susceptible to artificial interference [ 9 ]. The celestial navigation system (CNS) is an autonomous navigation system that has lower positioning accuracy than the GNSS but has the advantage of not accumulating navigation error and a strong ability to resist electromagnetic interference [ 10 , 11 , 12 ]. Thus, researchers have also investigated the INS/CNS integrated navigation system, which incorporates the measurement information from the CNS to correct the deviations in the INS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the installation parameters of the star sensor in the satellite body coordinate system are measured exactly, the virtual body coordinate systems determined by the installation parameters of the different star sensor combination modes are consistent, and the orientation of the satellite body in the J2000 celestial coordinate system can be calculated correctly. However, owing to vibrations and thermal shocks that arise during launch and orbit penetration process, there is a gap between the on-orbit actual installation parameters and the on-ground measured parameters [10]. Therefore, the virtual body coordinate systems determined by the different star sensor combination modes are inconsistent, causing systematic errors in the precise attitude determinations of different combination modes [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%