2005 IEEE Aerospace Conference 2005
DOI: 10.1109/aero.2005.1559659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-flight fault detection and isolation in aircraft flight control systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For control design purposes, the aircraft nonlinear plant is linearized about a trim point ( , ) 0 0 X U as [15] x p = A p x p + B p u y p = Cx p + Du (2) where p x is the state, u is the input, p A is the system matrix, p B is the input matrix. The state p x consists of angle of attack , sideslip angle , airspeed V , roll rate p , pitch rate q , yaw rate r , and three Euler angles , , .…”
Section: The Baseline Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For control design purposes, the aircraft nonlinear plant is linearized about a trim point ( , ) 0 0 X U as [15] x p = A p x p + B p u y p = Cx p + Du (2) where p x is the state, u is the input, p A is the system matrix, p B is the input matrix. The state p x consists of angle of attack , sideslip angle , airspeed V , roll rate p , pitch rate q , yaw rate r , and three Euler angles , , .…”
Section: The Baseline Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the unforeseeable dynamic characteristics changes, such as structure damage of the aircraft occurring, control surface failure, or the position of center of gravity shifting, the conventional controller cannot adjust control parameters according to the control error, being likely to lead to disastrous consequences. The fault-tolerance flight control system can reconstruct the control law according to control deviation, and still maintain the satisfying performance, at least possess the ability of safety returning, which will greatly improve the safety level of aircraft system [1][2] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, failures of system components are unavoidable as a consequence of repetitive strain during their working activity. Automatic diagnosis and compensation for faults is therefore an important feature for a controlled system, since a faulty behavior of a system can jeopardize personnel and/or users involved, as for aeronautical systems (see, by example, [1], [13], [4] and references therein) or chemical plants ( [17], [12] and more recently [14]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former "wait" until a fault or failure occurs (Maybeck and Stevens, 1991;Maybeck, 1999), whereas the latter will artificially excite the aircraft, either by flying health check maneuvers (Elgersma et al, 1998;Azam et al, 2005), or by injecting test signals in the actuator commands and then assessing the individual health status of actuators and sensors (Elgersma and Glavaski, 2001;Campbell and Nikoukhah, 2004;Ducard and Geering, 2006;Boskovic et al, 2007;Ducard, 2009;Bateman et al, 2011). This paper presents a new method that is inspired by the artificial actuator excitation mechanism used in conjunction with the EMMAE scheme as presented by Ducard and Geering (2006;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%