“…In the wake of Peters's call, the weather (Randerson, 2018), climates (Cahill et al, 2022), air (Horn, 2018), seawater (Jue, 2020) and even the Earth itself (Russill, 2017) have been reclaimed and interrogated 'as mediums' , whilst, meeting these readings halfway, media studies has increasingly attended to the chemicals, minerals and compounds that make up media infrastructures and technologies (Parikka, 2015;Mattern, 2017), as well as to the "environmental implications" of their decay (Cubitt, 2017).1 Parallel to this, the ever-growing field of 'ecocinema' (Willoquet-Maricondi, 2010;Rust et al, 2013) has turned to cinema's dependence on natural resources (Bozak, 2012), the building of artificial weather-worlds (McKim, 2013;Fay, 2018), and cinema's engagement with nature, the nonhuman and the environment more broadly (Ivakhiv, 2013;Narraway and Pick, 2013;O'Brien, 2018;Peterson & Uhlin, 2019;Guan & O'Brien, 2020).…”