“…In essence, developmental/constructivist approaches to reading assume that children will naturally discover how to read when immersed in spoken and written language, and therefore, the teacher does not explicitly direct student responding but instead provides naturalistic opportunities for student learning to take place (Daly et al, 1996;OHRC, 2022;Rayner et al, 2001). Engelmann argued that developmental approaches to teaching reading tend to focus on student variables out of the teacher's direct control (e.g., developmental "readiness"), whereas behavioral approaches provide teachers with tangible aspects of the environment to manipulate to better support targeted learning (e.g., strategic arrangement of antecedents, instructional prompting procedures, manipulation of stimuli, provision of reinforcement, and error correction; Heward et al, 2021;Spencer, 2021). Notably, reviews of reading research (e.g., NRP, 2000;OHRC, 2022;Rose, 2006;Rowe, 2005) have consistently favored behaviorally based instructional practices over constructivist based approaches, and Direct Instruction has consistently been reported as the most effective instructional approach to reading over other approaches (Barbash, 2021;Gersten et al, 2017;Przychodzin-Havis et al, 2005;Stockard et al, 2018).…”