2017
DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2017.78.3.137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-hospital cardiac arrest epidemiology in a mature rapid response system

Abstract: An audit examined the epidemiology of in-hospital cardiac arrests 5 years after a rapid response system was introduced, exploring the frequency of arrests in monitored and unmonitored areas. Details of the initial cardiac rhythm and what proportion of events were preceded by a medical emergency team call were also assessed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the frequency of cardiac arrests in our study was 0.32/1,000 admissions. This is far lower than some Australian studies which report a frequency of cardiac arrests between 1.46 and 3.76/1,000 admissions in the context of a medical emergency team (24). This may also be consistent with the fact that some critically ill patients prefer to leave the hospital and to die at home when their situation becomes critical rather than wait to be resuscitated.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiessupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Moreover, the frequency of cardiac arrests in our study was 0.32/1,000 admissions. This is far lower than some Australian studies which report a frequency of cardiac arrests between 1.46 and 3.76/1,000 admissions in the context of a medical emergency team (24). This may also be consistent with the fact that some critically ill patients prefer to leave the hospital and to die at home when their situation becomes critical rather than wait to be resuscitated.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiessupporting
confidence: 75%
“…[24][25][26] Even in mature RRS a portion of IHCAs are still preceded by escalation criteria breaches. [27][28][29] Activation of the RRS in the presence of objective escalation criteria in a period of greater than 30 min prior to an IHCA may allow the RRS to prevent the event from occurring. 30,31 Periods of less than 30 min may not be sufficient to allow the RRT to effectively intervene.…”
Section: Recommendation 2: Hospitals Should Measure Predictable Ward mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IHCAs are associated with escalation criteria breaches that were not acted upon. [27][28][29] Thus, ongoing assessment of the reliability of detection and evaluation of deteriorating patients is warranted.…”
Section: Recommendation 3: Hospitals Should Measure Timeliness Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the data published by the United Kingdom NCAA for 2011-2013, they have a rate of 1.6 per every 1,000, and specific rates of 1.51-6.28 per every 1,000 patients admitted to US and European hospitals. (3,(20)(21)(22) The probable cause of this clear fluctuation among the institutional rates should be the lack of a consensus when publishing data and the proportion of ICU beds, coronary care unit (CCU) and Catheterization Laboratories (cath-lab) versus the general hospitalization wards. (20) The statistical analysis of epidemiological studies indicates that cardiac arrest is slightly more frequent in males, with 58.3 %-66.2 % of all IHCA cases.…”
Section: Inpatient Cardiac Arrestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3,(20)(21)(22) The probable cause of this clear fluctuation among the institutional rates should be the lack of a consensus when publishing data and the proportion of ICU beds, coronary care unit (CCU) and Catheterization Laboratories (cath-lab) versus the general hospitalization wards. (20) The statistical analysis of epidemiological studies indicates that cardiac arrest is slightly more frequent in males, with 58.3 %-66.2 % of all IHCA cases. (1,3,10) Its incidence is proportional to the age of the patient, with a peak between 52 and 77 years.…”
Section: Inpatient Cardiac Arrestmentioning
confidence: 99%