2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2021.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-house multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification assay for citrin deficiency: analytical validation and novel exonic deletions in SLC25A13

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If only one or none such mutation was identified in NICCD highly suspicious patients, Sanger sequencing or target Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) of all the SLC25A13 exons and their flanking sequences [1,7,17,21, or entire open frames of SLC25A13 cDNA would be performed to identify the possible novel mutation [28]. Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) should be considered a test of choice for molecular diagnosis of CD when the sequencing result is inconclusive [29]. In the current study, four mutations I, III, X, and XIX were the target mutations screened by PCR-RFLP, subsequently, undetected patients would be sequenced for whole 18 exons and their adjacent introns of the SLC25A13 gene.…”
Section: Discussion Mutation Identification and Genotypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If only one or none such mutation was identified in NICCD highly suspicious patients, Sanger sequencing or target Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) of all the SLC25A13 exons and their flanking sequences [1,7,17,21, or entire open frames of SLC25A13 cDNA would be performed to identify the possible novel mutation [28]. Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) should be considered a test of choice for molecular diagnosis of CD when the sequencing result is inconclusive [29]. In the current study, four mutations I, III, X, and XIX were the target mutations screened by PCR-RFLP, subsequently, undetected patients would be sequenced for whole 18 exons and their adjacent introns of the SLC25A13 gene.…”
Section: Discussion Mutation Identification and Genotypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the ACMG guidelines, the pathogenicity analysis is PVS1 + PM2 + PP4, so it is likely pathogenic. Exon deletion is a rare variant type among SLC25A13 variants, which are mainly caused by large fragment deletion, including exon deletion, such as c.329–154_468 + 2352del2646bp (deletion of exon 5) ( 12 ), c.70–862_c.212 + 3527 del4532bp (deletion of exon 3) ( 13 ), Ex16 + 74_IVS17-32del516 (deletion of exon 17) ( 14 ), c.329–1687 -c.468 + 3865del5692bp (deletion of exon 5) ( 15 ), c.1019_1177 + 893del (deletion of exon 11) ( 16 ), c.1312–2860_1452 + 988del (deletion of exon 14) ( 17 ), c.1312–4144_1452 + 3373del (deletion of exon 14) ( 17 ) and c.3251 _c.15 + 18443del21709bp (deletion of exon 1) ( 18 ). Partial abnormal splicing of partially intron regions leads to exome deletions in mRNA, such as IVS4ins6 kb (skipping of exon 5) ( 19 ), IVS11+1 G > A (skipping of exon 11) ( 20 ), IVS15 + 1G > T (skipping of exon 15) ( 21 ) and IVS13+1G > A (skipping of exon 13) ( 22 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far, research on citrin deficiency has mainly focused on pathogenesis [9,10], genetic diagnosis [11,12], and dietary treatment strategies [13,14]. There is no research study investigating the difficulties caregivers experience in dietary management, and the reasons underlying for these challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%