2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12161-016-0539-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-house Validation of a DNA Extraction Protocol from Honey and Bee Pollen and Analysis in Fast Real-Time PCR of Commercial Honey Samples Using a Knowledge-Based Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…DNA was isolated from loose Poaceae pollen grains and aerobiological samples on different supports (melinex tape or Petri dish) using a modified CTAB method (Torricelli et al., ). Sterile distilled water was used as negative control for DNA extraction in each session.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…DNA was isolated from loose Poaceae pollen grains and aerobiological samples on different supports (melinex tape or Petri dish) using a modified CTAB method (Torricelli et al., ). Sterile distilled water was used as negative control for DNA extraction in each session.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After exposure, they were simply plugged and sealed with parafilm until the beginning of the extraction protocol, when the first reagent was added directly in them. DNA was isolated from loose Poaceae pollen grains and aerobiological samples on different supports (melinex tape or Petri dish) using a modified CTAB method (Torricelli et al, 2016). Sterile distilled water was used as negative control for DNA extraction in each session.…”
Section: Preparation Of Aerobiological Samples Dna Extraction Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Methods have been described to detect specific floral pollen DNA fragments in honey using PCR and metabarcoding (Jain et al 2013;Lalhmangaihi et al 2014;Guertler et al 2014;Bruni et al 2015;Soares et al 2015;Hawkins et al 2015;Torricelli et al 2016;Prosser and Hebert 2017) and recently advocated as a marker for mānuka honey (MPI 2017c). These markers indicate the presence but not the amount of mānuka honey in a sample.…”
Section: Dnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally the pollen was suspended with 0.5ml of CTAB extraction. The performance of pretreatments was validated (Torricelli et. al., 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%