2016
DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Kidney Transplant Recipients With a Positive Virtual Crossmatch, High PRA was Associated With Lower Incidence of Viral Infections

Abstract: Although more than 40% of patients with a positive virtual crossmatch presented with BK infection/CMV disease, high PRA greater than 80% seemed to be protective.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although aggressive immunosuppression is inevitable, limited information is available regarding infectious complications in positive-crossmatch KT. Two studies reported that viral infection was increased in positive-crossmatch KT patients; however, they did not contain a control group [29, 30]. A recent multicenter study reported that the rates of readmission owing to infectious complications in both HLA-incompatible group and control subjects were virtually the same [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although aggressive immunosuppression is inevitable, limited information is available regarding infectious complications in positive-crossmatch KT. Two studies reported that viral infection was increased in positive-crossmatch KT patients; however, they did not contain a control group [29, 30]. A recent multicenter study reported that the rates of readmission owing to infectious complications in both HLA-incompatible group and control subjects were virtually the same [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, there was no difference in the rate of ABMR comparing the DSA MFI 100-500 group (7.7%) versus the negative DSA group (4.5%) (p = . 19) or DSA MFI more than or equal to 500-1000 group (8%) versus the negative DSA group (4.5%) (p = .21). In the adjusted analysis, the low-level DSA group had a two-fold increased risk of developing ABMR compared with the DSA negative group, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = .07).…”
Section: Rejection Graft and Patient Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…18 Consequently, these patients receive stronger short-and long-term immunosuppression including higher doses of maintenance therapy. 6,19,20 Patients with pretransplant DSA are at increased risk of rejection without proper immunosuppression, while at the same time, these patients may also develop infectious complications due to overimmunosuppression. In agreement with this, patients in our cohort with lowlevel and positive DSA were at increased risk of developing both ABMR and BK viremia.…”
Section: Infectious Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients undergoing renal transplant biopsy had BK plasma PCR tested as a part of the biopsy visit. Also, BK PCR was monitored every 2 weeks for 3 months if a patient was treated for rejection …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasma BK PCR was monitored every 2 weeks for the first 3 months post-transplant, every month for months 3-6, and every 3 months from months 6 to 12. All patients undergoing renal transplant biopsy had BK plasma PCR tested as a part of the biopsy visit.Also, BK PCR was monitored every 2 weeks for 3 months if a patient was treated for rejection 13.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%