2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In My Shoes – Validation of a computer assisted approach for interviewing children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only a few studies have examined the use of computers in conducting interviews with young children. These studies [ 33 , 39 41 ] have demonstrated that children who were interviewed using a computer-assisted approach communicated their experiences with great detail, depth, and accuracy, similar to children who were interviewed using standard face-to-face methods. However, no study has yet examined whether all young children benefit equally well from being interviewed using a computer or whether certain groups of children, for example, shy children for whom the interview presents a demanding and uncomfortable situation, respond better to a computer-assisted approach than to a standard face-to-face one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few studies have examined the use of computers in conducting interviews with young children. These studies [ 33 , 39 41 ] have demonstrated that children who were interviewed using a computer-assisted approach communicated their experiences with great detail, depth, and accuracy, similar to children who were interviewed using standard face-to-face methods. However, no study has yet examined whether all young children benefit equally well from being interviewed using a computer or whether certain groups of children, for example, shy children for whom the interview presents a demanding and uncomfortable situation, respond better to a computer-assisted approach than to a standard face-to-face one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To sacrifice children's autonomy and privacy for face-to-face questioning gives no guarantee of greater authenticity or of more data. In fact, Fängström et al (2016) found that preschoolers talked more about their subjective experiences in computer-assisted interviews than in face-to-face interviews.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAIs have been particularly useful with vulnerable children, for example, children with autism spectrum disorders (Barrow & Hannah 2012), and preschoolers asked about their emotional reactions to health care visits (Fängström et al, 2016). Alper and Goggin (2017) were careful to note that the digital medium that could make communication easier for disabled children made it harder if their particular vulnerabilities and constraints were ignored.…”
Section: Computer-assisted Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another alternative approach would be computer-assisted self interviews [7,18,24,34,41,45]. There have been studies conducted with children using computer-assisted self interviews that have demonstrated an increase in disclosure rates because of the level of anonymity and lack of judgment [7,18,24,34,41,45]; however it is very difficult without the use of an avatar or virtual human to establish rapport [40], which is a critical element in forensic interviews [42]. In order for a forensic interview to be successful in obtaining truthful and accurate information from children, the children must feel a sense of anonymity, a lack of judgement from the interviewer, and have the ability to develop rapport with the interviewer [40,42].…”
Section: Encouragement Of Inaccurate Disclosuresmentioning
confidence: 99%