2014
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2013.120006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-Orbit Tracking of Resident Space Objects: A Comparison of Monocular and Stereoscopic Vision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The control law is based on the sliding model control presented in Segal et al. 22 Define the sliding manifold as where Λ is a positive definite matrix.…”
Section: Attitude Control For Los Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The control law is based on the sliding model control presented in Segal et al. 22 Define the sliding manifold as where Λ is a positive definite matrix.…”
Section: Attitude Control For Los Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the system model in equation (10) and the sliding manifold in equation (114), the following control torque is introduced 22 where ξ is a small positive scalar specifying the thickness of a boundary layer neighboring the switching surface and χ is a nonnegative constant which depends on the magnitude of the disturbances. 22…”
Section: Attitude Control For Los Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only recently, however, has it been proposed as a mechanism for small satellite proximity operations [4,16,17]. Advantages of stereoscopic imaging for space-based imaging, in comparison with the previously mentioned relative sensing alternatives, include its passive sensing nature and the availability of inexpensive low-power commercial off-the-shelf stereo cameras for small satellite applications.…”
Section: Stereoscopic Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although radio frequency and GNSS receivers are commonly employed in missions implementing formation flying [2], the utilization of on-board cameras remains an appealing choice because considered as a low cost and mainly passive solution, while providing accurate and somehow independent kind source of measurements of the line-of-sight [3] and, in some cases, of the entire relative pose of the observed spacecraft [4]. Further, the technology readiness of space-qualified cameras, as well as of the on-board computers for mid-sized satellites, is mature enough to allow for an on-board implementation of algorithms for the realtime estimation of relative pose among spacecraft [5] [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%