Performance Confirmation of Constructed Geotechnical Facilities 2000
DOI: 10.1061/40486(300)24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-Place Stiffness and Modulus Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The small-strain modulus of soils is routinely measured in earthquake engineering. In pavement engineering, the application of small-strain modulus tests to assess the modulus of pavement materials and structural variability for pavement performance has increased dramatically (Kim and Stokoe 1992;Souto et al 1994;Kim et al 1997;Chen et al 1999;Nazarian et al 1999;Fiedler et al 2000;Yesiller et al 2000;Zeng et al 2002;Nazarian et al 2003;Sawangsuriya et al 2005;Edil and Sawangsuriya 2005). The main advantage of small-strain modulus tests is the ability to noninvasively and nondestructively assess the modulus of pavement materials at the surface or under a free-field condition (i.e., near-zero confining pressure).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The small-strain modulus of soils is routinely measured in earthquake engineering. In pavement engineering, the application of small-strain modulus tests to assess the modulus of pavement materials and structural variability for pavement performance has increased dramatically (Kim and Stokoe 1992;Souto et al 1994;Kim et al 1997;Chen et al 1999;Nazarian et al 1999;Fiedler et al 2000;Yesiller et al 2000;Zeng et al 2002;Nazarian et al 2003;Sawangsuriya et al 2005;Edil and Sawangsuriya 2005). The main advantage of small-strain modulus tests is the ability to noninvasively and nondestructively assess the modulus of pavement materials at the surface or under a free-field condition (i.e., near-zero confining pressure).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Generally, Go of geomaterials is routinely measured in earthquake engineering. In highway engineering, the application of Go tests to assess the stiffness of highway materials and structural variability for pavement performance has increased dramatically (Kim and Stokoe 1992, Souto et al 1994, Kim et al 1997, Chen et al 1999, Nazarian et al 1999, Fiedler et al 2000, Yesiller et al 2000, Zeng et al 2002, Nazarian et al 2003. The key advantage of Go tests over conventional modulus tests is their ability to rapidly and non-destructively assess the shear modulus of highway materials at the surface or under a free-field condition (i.e., zero confining pressure).…”
Section: Application Of Wave Propagation Methods In Pavement Design Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The near-surface stiffness of geomaterials is then determined as the ratio of the applied force to the measured deflection. Wu et al (1998), Humboldt (1999, 2000a, 2000b, Fiedler et al (1998Fiedler et al ( , 2000, Nelson and Sondag (1999), Chen et al (1999), Siekmeir et al (1999), Hill et al (1999), Sargand et al (2000), Weaver et al (2001), Lenke et al (2001Lenke et al ( , 2003, Sargand (2001), Peterson et al (2002), Sawangsuriya et al (2002Sawangsuriya et al ( , 2003Sawangsuriya et al ( , 2004) Bender Element…”
Section: Test Principle Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current in situ quality evaluation testing techniques include stiffness test methods [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. Stiffness spot test methods are less frequently employed, as the number of test points is limited, certain test methods are time-consuming, and they cause interference with the construction operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%