2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-plane energy absorption characteristics of a modified re-entrant auxetic structure fabricated via 3D printing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reproduced with permission. [ 259 ] Copyright 2022, Elsevier Ltd. l–n) Samples of foam‐filled honeycomb, and the stress–strain curves of slow‐recovery foam filled with different cell wall thicknesses and cell angles re‐entering the honeycomb. Reproduced with permission.…”
Section: Honeycomb Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reproduced with permission. [ 259 ] Copyright 2022, Elsevier Ltd. l–n) Samples of foam‐filled honeycomb, and the stress–strain curves of slow‐recovery foam filled with different cell wall thicknesses and cell angles re‐entering the honeycomb. Reproduced with permission.…”
Section: Honeycomb Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Copyright 2020, Elsevier Ltd. j,k) Schematic diagram of the modified re-entrant honeycomb structure, and the stress-strain curves for regular re-entrant honeycomb and optimal structure. Reproduced with permission [259]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier Ltd. l-n) Samples of foam-filled honeycomb, and the stress-strain curves of slow-recovery foam filled with different cell wall thicknesses and cell angles re-entering the honeycomb.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction of geometric parameters such as the ratio of base length and connection angle on the hardness, strength, and energy absorption properties of re‐entrant auxetic honeycombs as a common type of auxetic structures was evaluated. [ 23–25 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their static/dynamic mechanical properties have also been studied to some extent. Researchers have used theoretical analysis, numerical simulation, and experimental methods to study its equivalent elastic modulus, indentation resistance [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ], and impact resistance [ 18 , 19 ], revealing that the impact resistance of honeycomb structures is affected by the cell shape, t/l (wall thickness/length), Poisson’s ratio, and other factors together [ 24 , 25 ]. In terms of the impact response of the honeycomb sandwich structure, Xie et al [ 26 ] studied the effects of the density of the honeycomb cores, face sheet thickness, punch diameter, and impact energy on the impact loads and failure modes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the previous studies have been focused on analyzing a single-type honeycomb structure, and there is a lack of comparative analysis of the different mechanical properties of honeycomb structures with a positive/negative/zero Poisson’s ratio [ 20 , 21 , 33 , 34 ]. Luo et al [ 35 ] studied the local impact resistance of honeycomb sandwich structures with different Poisson’s ratios and found that the negative Poisson’s ratio honeycomb had a more substantial impact bearing capacity, while the zero Poisson’s ratio honeycomb had a better damping and energy absorption capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%