2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.02.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-plane lattice thermal conductivities of multilayer graphene films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
83
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
9
83
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the pristine graphene sheet, the extrapolation gives k ? = 774 W/mK, which is in agreement with recent NEMD calculations on the same potential model [16,32,34]. The large deviation from linearity at the maximum concentration (10 % silicon atoms) is related to the Thermal conductivity reduction in graphene with silicon impurity 1195 resolution of conductivity, i.e., the conductivity value is so small that the inverse value appears large.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the pristine graphene sheet, the extrapolation gives k ? = 774 W/mK, which is in agreement with recent NEMD calculations on the same potential model [16,32,34]. The large deviation from linearity at the maximum concentration (10 % silicon atoms) is related to the Thermal conductivity reduction in graphene with silicon impurity 1195 resolution of conductivity, i.e., the conductivity value is so small that the inverse value appears large.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…(5). There are three conjectures on the behavior of the thermal conductivity: (1) As in MD simulation, the bulk thermal conductivity is usually estimated by the Matthiessen's rule preferred in general bulk (three dimensional) materials , which assumes a finite k at infinite length [31,32]; (2) the k diverges in lower dimensions especially with logarithmic law (log dependence) for two dimensional lattices, which, in graphene, is known to be valid up to L \ *9 lm, and then diverges [35]; and (3) the k follows log dependence when L is smaller than about 100 lm, and for longer L, it converges when the thermal transport reaches the diffusive regime [36].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is considered to be due to interlayer interactions and vibrational restrictions from neighboring layers, which limits the free vibration of the graphene sheets and imposes resistance on phonon transport. [45] Therefore, we believe that the thermal transport properties of our rGO fibers are not an indication of the in-plane thermal conductivity of the individual layers due to the tangled nature of the rGO sheets in the fiber and lattice defects that are introduced during GO sheet synthesis and subsequent reduction processes. These effects further contribute to the lower thermal conductivity measurements compared to pristine graphene.…”
Section: Thermal Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…15,16 In additional to posing resistance to thermal transport in the direction that is normal to the vdW interface, phonon behavior at vdW interfaces could also have important effects to energy flow in the direction parallel to the vdW interface. For example, it has been shown that the in-plane thermal conductivity of multi-layer graphene 17 or supported graphene 8 is lower than that of suspended single-layer graphene, [17][18][19][20][21] which has been attributed to the interlayer phonon scattering or that between the supported graphene and the substrate. 17,[19][20][21][22] On the contrary, Guo et al's 23 and Ong et al's 24 results show that the coupling force plays an positive role in the enhancement of thermal conductivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%