2006
DOI: 10.1348/096317906x100648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In praise of contemporary occupational psychology: A response to Kwiatkowski, Duncan and Shimmin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the long history of debate over the issue, there remains disagreement over the nature, extent, and possible causes of the gap (e.g., Anderson, 2007;Guest, 2006). Most commentators suggest that there is a gap between science and practice and that this is problematic; however, there remains disagreement over how to address it.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the long history of debate over the issue, there remains disagreement over the nature, extent, and possible causes of the gap (e.g., Anderson, 2007;Guest, 2006). Most commentators suggest that there is a gap between science and practice and that this is problematic; however, there remains disagreement over how to address it.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of membership, they compared 1991 data to December 2003 data and found that the number of Members, Associate Members, International Affiliates, Student Members, and Student International Affiliates had all increased over that time span with the overall increase of 66.5% ( N = 3,314 to N = 5,519). They concluded that the data show a field that is growing at a considerable pace (see Guest, 2006, for a similar observation regarding organizational psychology in the UK).…”
Section: Organizational Psychology: Vibrant Yet Vulnerablementioning
confidence: 72%
“…Lewin, 1947). In the UK the Tavistock Institute, established in 1947, became an influential focus for researchers and practitioners interested in psychodynamic perspectives on organizational change, action research methods, socio-technical systems theory, and group dynamics (Guest, 2006). Arguably this point marks the start of a divergence between quantitative and qualitative researchers that remains today.…”
Section: Historical Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%