2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-06453-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-process measurement of springback in tube rotary draw bending

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No visible wrinkles are observed on all three samples. Considering the intrinsic problem of spring back associated with every RDB process [37], a precise repeatability is exhibited by the experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No visible wrinkles are observed on all three samples. Considering the intrinsic problem of spring back associated with every RDB process [37], a precise repeatability is exhibited by the experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He demonstrated that reduced contact surfaces of a bend die provide appropriate bending results in a RDB process under some speci c considerations. The pressure die is one of the fundamental forming tools used in a RDB process since it provides a counter support to the bent tube during bending process [11]. Borchmann et al demonstrated that pressure die clearance is a signi cant process parameter in RDB processes [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allwood et al [4] discuss digital cameras, laser sensors and light section sensors as optical measurement systems for the bending angle for the case of V-bending. Simonetto [5] investigated the springback in rotary draw bending and proposed an inline inertial measuring unit system (IMU) enabling a closed-loop control for the process. In another contribution the author proves the strategy also for the three-roll-push-bending [6].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current measurement methods are mainly divided into two categories: contact measurement and non-contact measurement. Contact measurement methods include the modeling method [4], coordinate measuring machine (CMM) measurement method [5], etc. Since the modeling method requires a comparison device for each tube to be tested, it is costly, inefficient, and requires a high degree of operator competence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%