2007
DOI: 10.1080/01436590701507628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In pursuit of a mythical state of Tamil Eelam: a rejoinder to Kristian Stokke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, Sarvananthan (2007) writes "In Pursuit of a Mythical State of Tamil Eelam: a rejoinder to Kristan Stokke" to refute the analysis developed by Stokke. The author criticises Stokke's analysis on the following two main grounds: (a) depending solely on LTTE-related sources for information and data, and (b) representing the LTTE as a "liberation movement" with mass support and commitment to performing state functions.…”
Section: The Ltte War With Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, Sarvananthan (2007) writes "In Pursuit of a Mythical State of Tamil Eelam: a rejoinder to Kristan Stokke" to refute the analysis developed by Stokke. The author criticises Stokke's analysis on the following two main grounds: (a) depending solely on LTTE-related sources for information and data, and (b) representing the LTTE as a "liberation movement" with mass support and commitment to performing state functions.…”
Section: The Ltte War With Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These provide interesting insights, but provide only a somewhat speculative basis for making rigorous assessments with regard to some of the key considerations and decisions within the insurgent movement. See also the rather hard-nosed scholarly confrontation between Sarvananthan (2007) and Stokke (2006). of them were politicians, with a strong vested interest in presenting their actions in a positive light.…”
Section: "Fieldwork": Navigating An Arena Of Conflicting and Missing mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The war between the central government and the Tamil separatists became manifest in the north and east through competing projects of rule (Fuglerud, 2009; Sarvananthan, 2007; Stokke, 2006; Uyangoda, 2007), or ‘governable orders’ (Korf et al, 2010). Importantly, the rivalry over state institutions, resources and symbols was not a mere side effect of the secessionist war, a tactical civil offshoot of a military confrontation.…”
Section: Sri Lanka: Setting the Stagementioning
confidence: 99%