2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-017-0844-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In reply: Proper use and interpretation of diaphragmatic ultrasonography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[60][61][62][63] The detailed description of these measures is beyond the scope of this review but has been described elsewere. [64][65][66][67] Two studies 60,61 comparing diaphragm excursion with the traditional weaning index found the sensitivity of diaphragm excursion to be 84.4 and 60% and specificity of 82.6 and 76%, respectively. Thickening of the diaphragm and thickening fraction is another measure used by DiNino et al 68 and Ferrari et al 69 against traditional measurement of the rapid shallow breathing index.…”
Section: Diaphragm Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[60][61][62][63] The detailed description of these measures is beyond the scope of this review but has been described elsewere. [64][65][66][67] Two studies 60,61 comparing diaphragm excursion with the traditional weaning index found the sensitivity of diaphragm excursion to be 84.4 and 60% and specificity of 82.6 and 76%, respectively. Thickening of the diaphragm and thickening fraction is another measure used by DiNino et al 68 and Ferrari et al 69 against traditional measurement of the rapid shallow breathing index.…”
Section: Diaphragm Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%