2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2009.10.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In search for a pentacoordinated monoorgano stannyl cation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 64 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tin atom, complexed within the cavity of cryptand[2.2.2], is bonded to a chloride anion at a distance of 2.532(2) Å, which is within the sum of ionic radii for tin(II) dication and a chloride anion (1.12 and 1.67 Å, respectively) and comparable to reported Sn(II)–Cl bond lengths. , The tin-cryptand complex has tin–oxygen and tin–nitrogen distances averaging 2.84 and 2.85 Å, respectively. The Sn–N bonds are longer than reported covalent Sn(II)–N bond lengths , and the Sn–O (cryptand) distances are longer than reported covalent Sn(II)–O bond lengths, , but comparable to those in the related tin(II)-crown ether complexes ( 5 – 9 ). , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The tin atom, complexed within the cavity of cryptand[2.2.2], is bonded to a chloride anion at a distance of 2.532(2) Å, which is within the sum of ionic radii for tin(II) dication and a chloride anion (1.12 and 1.67 Å, respectively) and comparable to reported Sn(II)–Cl bond lengths. , The tin-cryptand complex has tin–oxygen and tin–nitrogen distances averaging 2.84 and 2.85 Å, respectively. The Sn–N bonds are longer than reported covalent Sn(II)–N bond lengths , and the Sn–O (cryptand) distances are longer than reported covalent Sn(II)–O bond lengths, , but comparable to those in the related tin(II)-crown ether complexes ( 5 – 9 ). , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%