The concept of 'internal marketing' has received considerable coverage in the literature, but even its most ardent supporters have noted problems in translating the concept into reality. This paper discusses the ndings of an exploratory case study carried out within 35 UK high street retail banks. Internal marketing is an initiative adopted by the organizations studied in order to nourish a marketing orientation. The implementation approach shapes the nature and form of the internal marketing communications that organizations adopt. Even though UK retail banks intend to implement internal marketing effectively, in reality the current implementation approach appears to be counter-productive to the achievement of the core aims of the initiative. The core nding from this exploratory research suggests that there are substantial barriers to the successful implementation of internal marketing within the banks studied, barriers such as the focus on short-term sales goals, the lack of a formal and 'holistic' implementation approach and the creation of 'personnel discrimination' and negative internal competition.Essentially, the communication process supports the transaction by either informing, persuading, reminding or differentiating.Marketing communications are concerned with the way in which the various stakeholders of an organization interact with each other and with the organization (Fill, 1999). Employees and management need to communicate with one another in order to carry out their work activities. Internal communication plays an important role in exchange transactions. At a basic level, internal communication can provide information and make employees/managers aware of, for example, organizational values and goals. Internal communication may also attempt to persuade employees to accept new policies and philosophies. It can also remind employees of a need they might have or remind them of the bene ts of transactions/exchanges they have with their employing organization. According to Fill (1999), internal marketing communications takes different roles.(1) DRIP factors: these are to differentiate employees/groups (D), to reassure/remind (R), to provide information (I) and to be persuasive (P). (2) Transactional factors: these are to coordinate actions, to promote the ef cient use of resources and to direct developments. (3) Af liation factors: these are to provide identi cation, to motivate personnel and to promote and coordinate activities with non-members. 88 PAPASOLOMOU-DOUKAKIS Downloaded by [University of Lethbridge] at 13:40 04 October 2015