1989
DOI: 10.1080/00754178808254832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In search of a methodology for evaluating psychoanalytic psychotherapy with children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The earlier work of the workshop contributed to the still, sadly, so relevant book Psychotherapy with Severely Deprived Children (Boston and Szur, 1983). It also led to research to evaluate psychoanalytic psychotherapy for fostered and adopted children (Boston, 1989;Lush, Boston and Grainger, 1991;Boston and Lush, 1994). This is work and evaluation which continues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The earlier work of the workshop contributed to the still, sadly, so relevant book Psychotherapy with Severely Deprived Children (Boston and Szur, 1983). It also led to research to evaluate psychoanalytic psychotherapy for fostered and adopted children (Boston, 1989;Lush, Boston and Grainger, 1991;Boston and Lush, 1994). This is work and evaluation which continues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is sometimes argued that research is only useful to the researchers and that it does not benefit either therapists or patients, or that it only proves what is already known through common sense (Boston, 1989). This is not borne out by my own experience as a research therapist.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mary Boston and Dora Lush have in many respects led the way when it comes to our profession thinking seriously about research and I am very sorry that I did not refer to their ground-breaking work (e.g. Boston, 1989;Boston andLush, 1994, Lush et al, 1998). Having said that, I do feel the research they describe in these papers has a slightly different methodological basis to the kind of work I was trying to explore (but no less valuable for that), although I agree that their research topic -the finely-tuned, long-term evaluation of psychoanalytic child psychotherapy -falls completely within the second and -to some degree -third circles I described.…”
Section: Reply To Mary Boston and Dora Lushmentioning
confidence: 96%