In search of an institutional framework for anticorruption: Lessons from Scandinavia

Abstract

Scandinavian countries continue to build strong reputations as the world's least corrupt countries. In this case study, in a search for an institutional framework that other countries and policy makers can learn from, we explore sources of high transparency and anticorruption norms in Scandinavia. The most important lesson from this study is that legislative, normative, and cultural institutional pillars must be aligned to achieve the highest level of transparency and anticorruption. We made three main observations. First, adequate and comprehensive legislation in addition to severe noncompliance consequences contribute to an ethical business environment in Scandinavian countries. Second, a willingness to embrace integrity norms and standards through active participation in international conventions and agreements on anticorruption movements contributing to high transparency and integrity management in the Scandinavian countries. Third, a national culture that emphasizes high governmental and civic trust makes bribery and corruption less sustainable. Residents' high level of trust in public officials and police in addition to high civil and media engagement in antibribery cases results in corruption being "starved of oxygen". The findings suggest high trust levels, enforced regulative legislation, small country size, and high human development help craft a framework that drives a transparent business environment. K E Y W O R D Santicorruption, culture, institutions, Scandinavia, transparency

Employee turnover and the social outreach (breadth): international evidence from the microfinance industry

“…Our findings revealed that employee turnover has a positive and statistically significant effect on the breadth of outreach only for NBFIs and other types of MFIs (Models 8 and 10). This means that legally bound MFIs will remain stable and functional even when some of their employees leave, consistent with the earlier scholarly evidence that institutional constraints influence organizational stability and order (North, 1990; Paik et al , 2019: Scott, 2005). Moreover, NBFIs are assumed to have different sets of human resource practices from other types of MFIs, which may explain their higher ETR (Nourani et al , 2022) (Figure 1).…”

Research for Rural Development 2022 : annual 28th International scientific conference proceedings

“…Transparency works as a mechanism of control and is a factor of equality in society (Schnackenberg & Tomlinson, 2016). Imbedded in the organisational culture, it prevents bribery, corruption, and crime (Paik, Warner-Søderholm, & Huse, 2018). Transparency reduces stakeholder distrust (Misangyi et al, 2008), helps to manage reputation and saves from public scandals (Klara, 2010), performs decision making in more responsible (Awaysheh & Klasse+n, 2010) and more ethical way committed (Jahansoozi, 2006), cooperative (Piske, 2002), and engaged (Vogelgesang & Lester, 2009).…”

Replicating the Nordic welfare model: policy prescriptions that recognize the cultural antecedents of solidarity

“…The Nordics exhibit high levels of trust in government. As politicians competed to demonstrate their trustworthiness, the Nordics' cultural heritage reduced political corruption (Paik et al, 2019). In the Nordic countries, unjustifiably taking advantage of the state is seen as a betrayal and stigmatized (Papadakis, 2023).…”