2012
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.524-527.3388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Search of Causal Relationship between FDI, GDP, and Energy Consumption - Evidence from China

Abstract: The balance between economic growth and environmental protection has been the core concern of policy makers in developing countries for the past two decades. This study is one of the few studies to empirically inspect the relationship between economic growth, FDI, and energy consumption over the period 1978-2010 in China. The results reveal that there is a unidirectional Granger causality running from GDP to energy consumption. This suggests that increase of GDP will consume more energy and implementing of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the long-run, we find that foreign capital inflows Granger cause output growth and as a result, energy consumption Granger causes foreign capital inflows. Our results are consistent with Dube (2009) for South Africa and Kuo et al (2012) for China who report that foreign capital inflows (proxies by FDI) and energy consumption are complementary i.e. bidirectional causality exists.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the long-run, we find that foreign capital inflows Granger cause output growth and as a result, energy consumption Granger causes foreign capital inflows. Our results are consistent with Dube (2009) for South Africa and Kuo et al (2012) for China who report that foreign capital inflows (proxies by FDI) and energy consumption are complementary i.e. bidirectional causality exists.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Finally, we concluded that there is a causality nexus from FDI to EC in Turkey based on Granger's (1969) linear causality test results, while the model of Dicks and Panchenko (2006) showed that there was no causality nexus between variables. Although the studies of Kuo et al (2012), Li and Qi (2016), Lin and Benjamin (2018), Wang and Jiayu (2019), Udemba et al (2020), Bujari and Martinez (2021), and Amoaka and Insaidoo (2021) examines different countries or country groups, the results we obtained are in line with these results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…We stress that there is a conceptual difference between causality and correlation (Liang, 2014;. The purpose of our study is not to make any statements in relation to establishing means of causality between FDI and Growth, as in Borensztein et al (1998), Nair-Reichert and Weinhold (2001), Zhang (2001), Choe (2003), Kuo et al (2003), Hoekman and Javorcik (2004), Li and Liu (2005), De Gregorio (2005), Hansen and Rand (2006), Mah (2010) nor "strict local effects" (Brambilla et al, 2009;Long, 2011, Wang et al, 2013), for example. This is much discussed elsewhere as this non-exhaustive list of references may indicate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%