2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In search of cross-cultural competence: A comprehensive review of five measurement instruments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher levels of cultural intelligence also predicted higher levels of cultural selfefficacy. These findings were also largely in line with literature [52,58,64,68]. An individual with higher scores on the motivation and cognition dimension of cultural intelligence showed higher levels of cultural self-efficacy through higher scores on the process, mix, cope, and understanding dimensions and on the process, cope, understanding, and language dimensions respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Higher levels of cultural intelligence also predicted higher levels of cultural selfefficacy. These findings were also largely in line with literature [52,58,64,68]. An individual with higher scores on the motivation and cognition dimension of cultural intelligence showed higher levels of cultural self-efficacy through higher scores on the process, mix, cope, and understanding dimensions and on the process, cope, understanding, and language dimensions respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The second key node is the cognitive dimension of cultural intelligence, which receives only one pathway, but is also sending out four pathways toward cultural self-efficacy. This evidence confirms that knowledge and motivation form the prime gateway toward effective intercultural behavior [41,42,58,74,75].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Yet, there is no systematic review of how cross-cultural collaborative activities are designed and implemented. A recent review by Chen and Gabrenya [32] was aimed at investigating the quality of instruments adopted for the evaluation of individual capabilities living and working in cross-cultural contexts, and the results indicated that cross-cultural competence measurement in terms of convergent validity was good, however, discriminant validity was lacking. However, this study did not delve deep into what these instruments were being used to measure, the research purpose, and the research methods used.…”
Section: The Deficiency Of Previous Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%