LIS has been originally defined as a discipline shaped by library as a place. The purpose of this paper is to clarify that this approach is not correct. The author, meanwhile, briefly answers the ten major problems in this regard, made by Nolin & Astrom. Through content analysis the text claims that the concept of LIS is not derived from library as a place; rather, it originates from the very man's need to information. The author states that the original concept of LIS does not suffer from weakness, if it is considered to have been originated from human need to information. However, the library as a place is a full-size manifestation of this need. Therefore, by changing the approach the major problems may be resolved. The paper provides a clear definition for LIS as a metadiscipline which deals interchangeably with all other fields of study.