In-season in-field variable resistance training: effects on strength, power, and anthropometry of junior soccer players

Izadi, Mani; Arazi, Hamid; Ramírez‐Campillo, Rodrigo; Mirzaei, Mohammad; Saidie, Payam

doi:10.23736/s0022-4707.19.09937-7

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In other team sports, individual training monitoring is a key process to obtain valuable information to train more effectively. 19 Moreover, the studies on monitoring daily training load only show information about internal load yet do not differentiate between player roles. 20,21 Thus, there is a lack of research on monitoring external load (jumps) on a daily basis (from the start to the end of season) and in terms of player role.…”

Section: Quality Of Oppositionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…19 Moreover, the studies on monitoring daily training load only show information about internal load yet do not differentiate between player roles. 20,21 Thus, there is a lack of research on monitoring external load (jumps) on a daily basis (from the start to the end of season) and in terms of player role. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the jump load by top-level volleyball players during an entire training season in terms of player role, training period, type of daily training, and quality of opposition in the subsequent match.…”

Section: Quality Of Oppositionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Analysis of jump load during a volleyball season in terms of player role

García-de-Alcaraz

Ramírez‐Campillo

Rivera-Rodríguez

et al. 2020

Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Quality Of Oppositionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Quality Of Oppositionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of jump load during a volleyball season in terms of player role

García-de-Alcaraz

Ramírez‐Campillo

Rivera-Rodríguez

et al. 2020

Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Finally, there were 35 articles relevant to our study. The remaining 35 articles were further evaluated, and 21 were screened out for the following reasons: 3 studies did not report average or standard deviations [ 17 , 40 , 41 ]; 1 study did not report maximum-strength indicators [ 42 ]; 15 studies did not compare the effects before and after the training intervention [ 15 , 20 , 21 , 25 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 ]; 2 studies had no CRT group [ 54 , 55 ]. Finally, a total of 14 studies were included in the meta-analysis.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Variable-Resistance Training Versus Constant-Resistance Training on Maximum Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Lin

Hong

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Greater muscular strength is generally associated with superior sports performance, for example, in jumping, sprinting, and throwing. This meta-analysis aims to compare the effects of variable-resistance training (VRT) and constant-resistance training (CRT) on the maximum strength of trained and untrained subjects. PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were comprehensively searched to identify relevant studies published up to January 2022. Fourteen studies that met the inclusion criteria were used for the systematic review and meta-analysis. Data regarding training status, training modality, and type of outcome measure were extracted for the analyses. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to assess the risk of bias. The pooled outcome showed improved maximum strength with VRT, which was significantly higher than that with CRT (ES = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.42–1.19) for all the subjects. In addition, trained subjects experienced greater maximum-strength improvements with VRT than with CRT (ES = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.22–0.93). Based on subgroup analyses, maximum-strength improvement with a VRT load of ≥80% of 1 repetition maximum (1RM) was significantly higher than that with CRT (ES = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.37–1.16) in trained subjects, while no significant differences were found between VRT and CRT for maximum-strength improvement when the load was <80% (ES = 0.00; 95% CI: −0.55–0.55). The untrained subjects also achieved greater maximum strength with VRT than with CRT (ES = 1.34; 95% CI: 0.28–2.40). Interestingly, the improved maximum strength of untrained subjects with a VRT load of <80% of 1RM was significantly higher than that with CRT (ES = 2.38; 95% CI: 1.39–3.36); however, no significant differences were noted between VRT and CRT when the load was ≥80% of 1RM (ES = −0.04; 95% CI: −0.89–0.81). Our findings show that subjects with resistance training experience could use a load of ≥80% of 1RM and subjects without resistance training experience could use a load of <80% of 1RM to obtain greater VRT benefits.

show abstract

“…At the beginning of the period, the main content of the training process is made up of fundamental (basic) exercises. Gradually, the ratio changes towards an increase in the proportion of special preparatory and competitive exercises [11,12]. The preparatory period is divided into two stages: general preparatory and special preparatory.…”

Section: Original Articlementioning

confidence: 99%

Combined impact method in the preparatory period of the annual macrocycle of female volleyball players aged 18–19 years old

Boichuk

Єрмаков

Vintoniak

et al. 2021

ppcs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Study Aim. The work aim is to develop and experimentally test the combined impact method performance in the preparatory period of the annual macrocycle of 18–19 year old volleyball players (girls). Material and Methods. The study involved volleyball players (girls) aged 18–19 years old (n = 24, training experience – 9 years). Volleyball players (girls) were divided into control (n = 12) and experimental (n = 12) groups. Results. The method contributed to a higher rate of growth of most parameters of special readiness among volleyball players (girls) of the experimental group. A significant improvement in special readiness (p <0.05) was revealed for all parameters in both groups. In the experimental group, an improvement (p <0.001) was observed for 8 out of 11 parameters. In the control group, a significant improvement in the results (p <0.001) occurred in 3 cases out of 11. A significant improvement in speed and strength training parameters (p <0.001) was revealed: in 3 out of 4 cases (experimental group); in 1 out of 4 cases (control group). The quality of performance of the game basic techniques improved by: 4–22% (p <0.04–0.001 in experimental group) 4–11% (p <0.05–0.02 in control group). Conclusions. It is advisable to devote more time to the development of more significant motor abilities of volleyball players (girls) (speed, speed and strength, dexterity and coordination). It is advisable to improve endurance in combination with the development of other motor abilities and in the process of technical and tactical improvement. In the physical training of volleyball players (girls), it is advisable to use as many training means as possible, which are similar to the main game techniques according to spatio–temporal and dynamic characteristics. Movements with load contribute to the development of intermuscular coordination and allow to quickly form the correct idea of the trained motor action.

show abstract

In-season in-field variable resistance training: effects on strength, power, and anthropometry of junior soccer players

Cited by 7 publications

References 39 publications

Analysis of jump load during a volleyball season in terms of player role

Analysis of jump load during a volleyball season in terms of player role

Effects of Variable-Resistance Training Versus Constant-Resistance Training on Maximum Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Combined impact method in the preparatory period of the annual macrocycle of female volleyball players aged 18–19 years old

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About