We evaluated the effectiveness of a silicone membrane as an alternative to human skin using the skin permeation parameters of chemical compounds. An in vitro permeation study using 15 model compounds was conducted, and permeation parameters comprising permeability coefficient (P), diffusion parameter (DL 2 ), and partition parameter (KL) were calculated from each permeation profile. Significant correlations were obtained in log P, log DL 2 , and log KL values between the silicone membrane and human skin. DL 2 values of model compounds, except flurbiprofen, in the silicone membrane were independent of the lipophilicity of the model compounds and were 100-fold higher than those in human skin. For antipyrine and caffeine, which are hydrophilic, KL values in the silicone membrane were 100-fold lower than those in human skin, and P values, calculated as the product of a DL 2 and KL, were similar. For lipophilic compounds, such as nbutyl paraben and flurbiprofen, KL values for silicone were similar to or 10-fold higher than those in human skin, and P values for silicone were 100-fold higher than those in human skin. Furthermore, for amphiphilic compounds with log K o/w values from 0.5 to 3.5, KL values in the silicone membrane were 10-fold lower than those in human skin, and P values for silicone were 10-fold higher than those in human skin. The silicone membrane was useful as a human skin alternative in an in vitro skin permeation study. However, depending on the lipophilicity of the model compounds, some parameters may be over-or underestimated.Key words silicone membrane; skin; membrane permeation; alternative membrane Skin forms an interface between the body and environment and functions as a firm barrier against undesirable elements. Many skin permeation studies of therapeutic drugs have been conducted to develop transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDSs) for the purpose of preventing the hepatic first-pass effect, which is observed for some oral dosage forms, and for controlling release over long periods of time.1-3) For the development and evaluation of TDDSs, in vitro skin permeation tests using excised human skin have been performed in the European Union (EU) and United States; however, in Japan, it is difficult to obtain human skin, so permeation studies using human skin are not performed as frequently. Therefore, animal skins, particularly those of hairless rat, mouse, and guinea pig, have been used for the evaluation of percutaneous absorption. Recently, however, sales of cosmetics in the EU, 4) for which animal experiments were performed during their development have been prohibited out of concern for animal welfare, and alternative membranes are now required to determine percutaneous absorption. In addition, permeation studies using animal or human skin are associated with several difficulties and limitations for assessing the effects of formulations components, because of the complex nature of this biological tissue and inter- and intra-individuality of skin.Artificial model membranes offer a simple and ...