2022
DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In silico exploration of amyloid‐related imaging abnormalities in the gantenerumab open‐label extension trials using a semi‐mechanistic model

Abstract: Introduction Amyloid‐related imaging abnormalities with edema/effusion (ARIA‐E) are commonly observed with anti‐amyloid therapies in Alzheimer's disease. We developed a semi‐mechanistic, in silico model to understand the time course of ARIA‐E and its dose dependency. Methods Dynamic and statistical analyses of data from 112 individuals that experienced ARIA‐E in the open‐label extension of SCarlet RoAD (a study of gantenerumab in participants with prodromal Alzheimer's … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in keeping with the hypothesis that immunotherapy-induced ARIA-E are iatrogenic manifestations of the spontaneously occurring ARIA-E of CAA-ri and point to CSF testing for anti-Aβ (auto)antibodies as a promising diagnostic, prognostic, and response to treatment biomarker of ARIA-E. 2,10,12,47,48 Further research to validate the utility of the biomarker is needed to reduce current heterogeneity in the interpretation of trials' results and improve the detection, therapeutic management, and monitoring of ARIA-E side events. 8,49,50 In this context, our results are of paramount importance for expediting the design of future confirmatory studies, e.g., (1) the need of testing patients within the first month from ARIA-E diagnosis, as the rate of microglial activation may change very quickly; (2) the importance of carefully considering preexisting CAA in addition to the Aβ plaque burden; (3) the potential of CSF testing for anti-Aβ (auto)antibodies; and (4) the urgent need of randomized clinical trials to confirm the effectiveness of corticosteroids in the prevention of ARIA-E. 1 Filling these knowledge gaps is of paramount importance if we consider that current guidelines suggest an empirical cutoff value of 5 microhemorrhages for patient enrollment in clinical trials and that no data exist on primary prevention with mAbs in patients with CAA. If the ARIA Paradox is true, it is possible that patients with CAA, but no AD copathology, have a reduced risk of ARIA-E.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in keeping with the hypothesis that immunotherapy-induced ARIA-E are iatrogenic manifestations of the spontaneously occurring ARIA-E of CAA-ri and point to CSF testing for anti-Aβ (auto)antibodies as a promising diagnostic, prognostic, and response to treatment biomarker of ARIA-E. 2,10,12,47,48 Further research to validate the utility of the biomarker is needed to reduce current heterogeneity in the interpretation of trials' results and improve the detection, therapeutic management, and monitoring of ARIA-E side events. 8,49,50 In this context, our results are of paramount importance for expediting the design of future confirmatory studies, e.g., (1) the need of testing patients within the first month from ARIA-E diagnosis, as the rate of microglial activation may change very quickly; (2) the importance of carefully considering preexisting CAA in addition to the Aβ plaque burden; (3) the potential of CSF testing for anti-Aβ (auto)antibodies; and (4) the urgent need of randomized clinical trials to confirm the effectiveness of corticosteroids in the prevention of ARIA-E. 1 Filling these knowledge gaps is of paramount importance if we consider that current guidelines suggest an empirical cutoff value of 5 microhemorrhages for patient enrollment in clinical trials and that no data exist on primary prevention with mAbs in patients with CAA. If the ARIA Paradox is true, it is possible that patients with CAA, but no AD copathology, have a reduced risk of ARIA-E.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further research to validate the utility of the biomarker is needed to reduce current heterogeneity in the interpretation of trials' results and improve the detection, therapeutic management, and monitoring of ARIA-E side events. 8, 49, 50…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aforementioned ARIA mechanisms were recently translated into the first semi‐mechanistic, in the silico model of ARIA‐E, the vascular wall disturbance (VWD) model 22 . The VWD model hypothesized that high local rates of Aβ removal (parenchymal or vascular) can trigger the ARIA‐E onset, as long as they are not counterbalanced by the rate of an intrinsic vascular repair process.…”
Section: Aging Aria and Caa‐related Inflammationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 12 Similarly, a semimechanistic pharmacokinetics (PK)–pharmacodynamics (PD) model has been developed for gantenerumab‐mediated ARIA‐E adverse effects. 13 Both models do not generalize to other antibodies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A time‐to‐event phenomenological exposure–response model for ARIA‐E has been developed specifically for aducanumab based on clinical data 12 . Similarly, a semimechanistic pharmacokinetics (PK)–pharmacodynamics (PD) model has been developed for gantenerumab‐mediated ARIA‐E adverse effects 13 . Both models do not generalize to other antibodies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%