2010
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In silico fragmentation for computer assisted identification of metabolite mass spectra

Abstract: BackgroundMass spectrometry has become the analytical method of choice in metabolomics research. The identification of unknown compounds is the main bottleneck. In addition to the precursor mass, tandem MS spectra carry informative fragment peaks, but the coverage of spectral libraries of measured reference compounds are far from covering the complete chemical space. Compound libraries such as PubChem or KEGG describe a larger number of compounds, which can be used to compare their in silico fragmentation with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
569
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 607 publications
(573 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
569
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Fragment ion spectra were recorded in scanning mode by high-resolution TOF MS. Peaks with intensity of at least 10% of the highest non-saturated peak intensity in the MS/MS spectra were extracted and matched with compounds in the PubChem database using MetFrag 47 . A top rank of the target compound among all matching compounds in the database was considered as further evidence for the initially proposed annotation based on accurate mass.…”
Section: Metabolomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fragment ion spectra were recorded in scanning mode by high-resolution TOF MS. Peaks with intensity of at least 10% of the highest non-saturated peak intensity in the MS/MS spectra were extracted and matched with compounds in the PubChem database using MetFrag 47 . A top rank of the target compound among all matching compounds in the database was considered as further evidence for the initially proposed annotation based on accurate mass.…”
Section: Metabolomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9) Our approach involved the use of the benchmark dataset reported by Hill et al as well as Wolf et al and Ridder et al In order to compare the results, we generated a merged product ion spectrum and retrieved candidates using PubChem in a manner similar to a previous report. 8) e results of the annotation are shown in Tables 1, S2-S5. Although we could not compare each result precisely, because the number of retrieved candidates was di erent, our protocol showed better results than previous reports in terms of average, median, and third quartile rank.…”
Section: Structure Assignment and Ranking Using A Benchmark Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6) Wolf et al developed the MetFrag protocol based on an annotation by comparing with computational fragmentation and scoring with the bond dissociation energy of the cleaved bond. 8) Ridder et al developed an annotation protocol referred to as MAGMa for MS n analysis using computational assignment and scoring based on a penalty value. 9) Our approach involved the use of the benchmark dataset reported by Hill et al as well as Wolf et al and Ridder et al In order to compare the results, we generated a merged product ion spectrum and retrieved candidates using PubChem in a manner similar to a previous report.…”
Section: Structure Assignment and Ranking Using A Benchmark Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further identification using MetFrag (http://msbi. ipb-halle.de/MetFrag/) was performed which provided in silico fragmentation (Wolf et al, 2010) for confirmation of the structural identity. The unsupervised multivariate statistics, principle component analysis (PCA), was performed using the ProfileAnalysis 2.0 software (BrukerDaltonics, Germany).…”
Section: Data Analysis and Multivariate Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%