2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.09.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In silico prediction and characterization of protein post-translational modifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
(111 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…356 The main experimental method used for identification of protein modifications is mass spectroscopy, 355 but bioinformatics-based prediction tools are also quite successful and commonly used. 357 Most of the post-translational modifications are observed in all types of proteins in all cellular compartments; however, tyrosine sulfation occurs only in the transmembrane and secretory proteins. 358 Multiple types of post-translational modifications may take place on a given protein during various stages of its activity (a review summarizing the post-translational modifications in class-C GPCRs is given in ref (359), see Figure 12).…”
Section: Biomembranes As the Target Of Simulations: Native Membranes mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…356 The main experimental method used for identification of protein modifications is mass spectroscopy, 355 but bioinformatics-based prediction tools are also quite successful and commonly used. 357 Most of the post-translational modifications are observed in all types of proteins in all cellular compartments; however, tyrosine sulfation occurs only in the transmembrane and secretory proteins. 358 Multiple types of post-translational modifications may take place on a given protein during various stages of its activity (a review summarizing the post-translational modifications in class-C GPCRs is given in ref (359), see Figure 12).…”
Section: Biomembranes As the Target Of Simulations: Native Membranes mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many databases and prediction tools have been developed to enhance the understanding of various PTMs in different organisms and to simplify the analysis of complex PTM data (Gianazza et al 2016). These PTM databases contain crucial sequence annotations, specific to some PTM types and/or organisms (Gupta et al 1999;Hornbeck et al 2015;Yao and Xu 2017), and provide related structural data which mainly correspond to the mapping of the PTM sites in protein entries of the Protein Data Bank (PDB) (Huang et al 2016).…”
Section: In Context Of Protein Function This Diversity Leads To Coope...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the type, some PTMs appear to have a preference for being located in either ordered or disordered secondary structure elements. [46] While lysine acetylation has no apparent preference for secondary structure placement, serine/threonine/tyrosine phosphorylations were found to exhibit a preference for disordered regions. These secondary structure preferences were confirmed in this work for both of these respective PTMs (S8 Fig) . Location within disordered regions has been suggested to have certain advantages: it might allow for faster reactions, as well as easier recognition of PTM sites by modification enzymes.…”
Section: Plos Computational Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%