The role of three-dimensional genome organization as a critical regulator of gene expression 1 has become increasingly clear over the last decade. Most of our understanding of this association 2 comes from the study of long range chromatin interaction maps provided by Chromatin Conformation 3 Capture-based techniques, which have greatly improved in recent years. Since these procedures are 4 experimentally laborious and expensive, in silico prediction has emerged as an alternative strategy 5 to generate virtual maps in cell types and conditions for which experimental data of chromatin 6 interactions is not available. Several methods have been based on predictive models trained on 7 one-dimensional (1D) sequencing features, yielding promising results. However, different approaches 8 vary both in the way they model chromatin interactions and in the machine learning-based strategy 9 they rely on, making it challenging to carry out performance comparison of existing methods. In this 10 study, we use publicly available 1D sequencing signals to model chromatin interactions in two human 11 cell lines and evaluate the prediction performance of 5 popular machine learning algorithms: decision 12 trees, random forests, gradient boosting, support vector machines and multi-layer perceptron. Our 13 approach accurately predicts long-range interactions and reveals that gradient boosting significantly 14 outperforms the other four algorithms, yielding accuracies of ∼ 95%. We show that chromatin features 15 in close genomic proximity to the anchors cover most of the predictive information. Moreover, we 16 demonstrate that gradient boosting models trained with different subsets of chromatin features, 17 unlike the other methods tested, are able to produce accurate predictions. In this regard, and 18 besides architectural proteins, transcription factors are shown to be highly informative. Our study 19 provides a framework for the systematic prediction of long-range chromatin interactions, identifies 20 gradient boosting as the best suited algorithm for this task and highlights cell-type specific binding 21 of transcription factors at the anchors as important determinants of chromatin wiring. 22