2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247249
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In silico screening and identification of deleterious missense SNPs along with their effects on CD-209 gene: An insight to CD-209 related-diseases

Abstract: DC-SIGN receptor articulated by macrophages and dendritic cells is encoded by CD209 gene and plays a role to activate and proliferate the T-lymphocytes in response of virus attack. The dysfunctional activity of DC-SIGN receptor because of missense SNPs can lead to cause dengue haemorrhage fever, HIV-1 infection etc. Out of 11 transcripts of CD209, all missense SNPs of canonical transcript were retrieved from Ensembl database and evaluated by their deleteriousness by using Polyphen-2, PMut, SIFT, MutPred, PROVE… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PROVEAN server utilizes the principal sequence of the protein and its sequence homologies, which are investigated by dint of BLAST in NCBI database. The prediction of PROVEAN is based on a scoring system where the cut-off value is −2.5 [ 54 ]. On the basis of this scoring system, amino acid substitution with PROVEAN score less than −2.5 will be determined as a deleterious mutation, while PROVEAN score greater than −2.5 will be determined as a neutral mutation [ 25 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PROVEAN server utilizes the principal sequence of the protein and its sequence homologies, which are investigated by dint of BLAST in NCBI database. The prediction of PROVEAN is based on a scoring system where the cut-off value is −2.5 [ 54 ]. On the basis of this scoring system, amino acid substitution with PROVEAN score less than −2.5 will be determined as a deleterious mutation, while PROVEAN score greater than −2.5 will be determined as a neutral mutation [ 25 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the predictions of all algorithms were found to correlate significantly with each other independently, while I-mutant3.0 showed a slight negative correlation with MutationAssessor. Since each algorithm uses different parameters for SNP assessment, SNPs that retrieved more positive responses in different SNP algorithms are more likely to be deleterious [ 22 , 23 ]. Therefore, SNPs that were considered deleterious by at least ten different in silico algorithms were classified as high-risk nsSNPs in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, residues, which are critical for protein stability, biomolecular interactions, and functions, are more usually conserved than others [ 22 ]. Therefore, SNPs in the conserved area are likely to be more pathogenic than those present in the variable region, disrupting structural stability, protein–protein interaction [ 24 ], and catalytic activity [ 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the above-mentioned facts, we performed extensive screening for the most damaging missense SNPs in MCM6 gene to identify the pathogenic SNPs. The MCM6 gene was extracted from the NCBI database and screened for high-risk pathogenicity using multiple bioinformatics tools with the highest precision level 27 29 . In addition, the mechanism by which pathogenic missense SNPs alter protein structure and function was also explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%