2011
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In silicocomparative analysis of SSR markers in plants

Abstract: BackgroundThe adverse environmental conditions impose extreme limitation to growth and plant development, restricting the genetic potential and reflecting on plant yield losses. The progress obtained by classic plant breeding methods aiming at increasing abiotic stress tolerances have not been enough to cope with increasing food demands. New target genes need to be identified to reach this goal, which requires extensive studies of the related biological mechanisms. Comparative analyses in ancestral plant group… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

35
81
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(111 reference statements)
35
81
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4). In our data, there is a higher preference for GC3 and similar preference has been reported in case of other plants (Victoria et al 2011). …”
Section: Microsatelites In Coding Regionssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4). In our data, there is a higher preference for GC3 and similar preference has been reported in case of other plants (Victoria et al 2011). …”
Section: Microsatelites In Coding Regionssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Among trinucleotide motifs, (AAG)n repeat class was the most predominant as also observed in earlier studies in other plant species (Tang et al 2009;Roorkiwal and Sharma 2011;Victoria et al 2011). Grover and Sharma (2004) suggested tendency of making alternative DNA structures by repeat motif as the reason underlying such abundance.…”
Section: Microsatellite Dynamics In Seabuckthorn Transcriptomesupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The primers to reveal SSR loci are designed to be complementary to these non repetitive flanking sequences -so the disadvantage of SSR markers is the necessity of knowing the sequences before the primers design. SSR markers are more frequently in no coding regions of the genome, those which will not be transcribed or translated into DNA or proteins (Victoria et al, 2011). SSR are used multialellic, what means that for a single locus more than two forms of the marker, composed by various number of repetitions, may be found (Figure 4).…”
Section: Repetitive Sequences Can Be Especially Polymorphicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reports on the mining of SSRs across plant genomes are reported over the years. There is a non-random distribution of microsatellite repeats in coding and noncoding regions in chloroplast genome of Brassicaceae family (Sumit et al 2010 (Victoria et al 2011). In human genome, 3% encompasses SSR motifs (Subramanian et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%