2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-018-4905-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Situ 3D Neutron Depolarization Study of the Transformation Kinetics and Grain Size Evolution During Cyclic Partial Austenite-Ferrite Phase Transformations in Fe-C-Mn Steels

Abstract: We have analyzed the evolution of the ferrite fraction and average ferrite grain size during partial cyclic austenite-to-ferrite and ferrite-to-austenite phase transformations in an Fe-0.25C-2.1Mn (wt pct) steel using three-dimensional neutron depolarization (3DND). In the 3DND experiments, the ferrite fraction is derived from the rotation angle of the neutron polarization vector, and the average grain size is determined from the shortening of the polarization vector. From these, the number density of ferrite … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During a cyclic partial phase transformation experiment the temperature is cycled between two temperatures, T 1 and T 2 , both within the aþg phase region [14]. Using this approach, the effect of nucleation, which is difficult to measure experimentally [14], can be excluded from an analysis of the kinetics as the transformation only progresses through the migration of already existing interfaces [13,21]. Secondly, in a CPPT experiment it is much easier to unambiguously allocate the interface kinetics to the local interface conditions present, which in itself is a function not only of the steel composition (in particular the Mn concentration as Mn has a high partitioning coefficient and can affect the effective interface mobility significantly [15]) and also of the thermal history.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During a cyclic partial phase transformation experiment the temperature is cycled between two temperatures, T 1 and T 2 , both within the aþg phase region [14]. Using this approach, the effect of nucleation, which is difficult to measure experimentally [14], can be excluded from an analysis of the kinetics as the transformation only progresses through the migration of already existing interfaces [13,21]. Secondly, in a CPPT experiment it is much easier to unambiguously allocate the interface kinetics to the local interface conditions present, which in itself is a function not only of the steel composition (in particular the Mn concentration as Mn has a high partitioning coefficient and can affect the effective interface mobility significantly [15]) and also of the thermal history.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%